Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04732-MJJ

Document 27

Filed 12/26/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Matthew S. Hale, Esq. HALE & ASSOCIATES Calif. State Bar No. 136690 45 Rivermont Drive Newport News, VA 23601 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1951 Newport News, VA 23601 Telephone No. (757) 596-1143 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs, DAVID J. LEE and DANIEL R. LLOYD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ) CHASE MANHATTAN BANK U.S.A., ) N.A., a Delaware corporation, CHASE ) MANHATTAN BANK U.S.A., N.A. d.b.a. ) CHASE BANK U.S.A., N.A., JPMORGAN ) CHASE & CO., a Delaware corporation; ) and DOES 1, through 100, inclusive, ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) DAVID J. LEE and DANIEL R. LLOYD, as individuals and, on behalf of others similarly situated, Case No.: C 07-4732 MJJ STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT, AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT HEARING

David J. Lee, et al. v. Chase Manhattan Bank U.S.A., N.A., et al., Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re: Continuance of Hearing Date of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, and Initial Case Management Hearing

Case 3:07-cv-04732-MJJ

Document 27

Filed 12/26/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Plaintiffs David J. Lee and Daniel R. Lloyd, and Defendants Chase Manhattan Bank U.S.A., N.A., Chase Manhattan Bank U.S.A., N.A. d.b.a. Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A., JPMorgan Chase & Co., stipulate to continue the hearing of the Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint, and to continue the case management conference, from Tuesday, January 8, 2008, to Tuesday, January 29, 2008. Defendants request that the hearing on the motion and the case management conference be specially set for afternoon of January 29, 2008 to accommodate counsel's desire to attend a hearing that morning in state court in San Jose. However, if a special setting is not available, counsel will adjust his schedule to appear at this Court's regular morning law & motion calendar call (at 9:30 a.m.). Plaintiffs do not oppose an afternoon hearing.

11

The parties respectfully request the Court continue the motion hearing and case
12

management conference to the date requested.
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Dated: December 26, 2007

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, L.L.P.

/s/
By: __________________________ Stephen J. Newman Esq. Counsel for Defendants

Dated: December 26, 2007

Hale & Associates

/s/
By: __________________________ Matthew S. Hale, Esq. Counsel for Plaintiffs
David J. Lee, et al. v. Chase Manhattan Bank U.S.A., N.A., et al., Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re: Continuance of Hearing Date of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, and Initial Case Management Hearing

Case 3:07-cv-04732-MJJ

Document 27

Filed 12/26/2007

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS ORDERED as follows: (1) Hearing of the Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint, and the case

management conference, shall be continued from Tuesday, January 8, 2008, to Tuesday, January
5

29, 2008 at ___________ in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, of the United States District Courthouse,
6

located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102.
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 David J. Lee, et al. v. Chase Manhattan Bank U.S.A., N.A., et al., Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re: Continuance of Hearing Date of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, and Initial Case Management Hearing

Date:

_____________________________ The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins U.S. District Court Judge