Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 34.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 14, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 485 Words, 3,036 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/195914/42.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 34.4 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04732-MJJ

Document 42

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Matthew S. Hale, Esq. HALE & ASSOCIATES Calif. State Bar No. 136690 45 Rivermont Drive Newport News, VA 23601 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1951 Newport News, VA 23601 Telephone No. (757) 596-1143 E-Mail: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs, DAVID J. LEE and DANIEL R. LLOYD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ) CHASE MANHATTAN BANK U.S.A., ) N.A., a Delaware corporation, CHASE ) MANHATTAN BANK U.S.A., N.A. d.b.a. ) CHASE BANK U.S.A., N.A., JPMORGAN ) CHASE & CO., a Delaware corporation; ) and DOES 1, through 100, inclusive, ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) DAVID J. LEE and DANIEL R. LLOYD, as individuals and, on behalf of others similarly situated, Case No.: C 07-4732 MJJ STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL'S TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT THE INITIAL JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT HEARING

1 David J. Lee, et al. v. Chase Manhattan Bank U.S.A., N.A., et al., Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re: Plaintiffs' Counsel's Telephonic Appearance at the Joint Case Management Hearing

Case 3:07-cv-04732-MJJ

Document 42

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4

Plaintiffs David J. Lee and Daniel R. Lloyd, and Defendants Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A., and JPMorgan Chase & Co., stipulate to permit the Plaintiffs' attorney, Matthew S. Hale, to appear telephonically at the Initial Case Management Hearing currently scheduled for Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 2:00 p.m., unless the Court grants the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss in

5

which case the hearing would be moot. The parties respectfully request the Court confirm their
6

stipulation with an Order that effect.
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 David J. Lee, et al. v. Chase Manhattan Bank U.S.A., N.A., et al., Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re: Plaintiffs' Counsel's Telephonic Appearance at the Joint Case Management Hearing

Dated: February 14, 2008

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, L.L.P.

/s/
By: __________________________ Stephen J. Newman Esq., Counsel for Defendant Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A., and JPMorgan Chase & CO.

Dated: February 14, 2008

Hale & Associates

/s/
By: __________________________ Matthew S. Hale, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiffs, David J. Lee, and Daniel R. Lloyd

Case 3:07-cv-04732-MJJ

Document 42

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiffs' attorney, Matthew S. Hale, may appear telephonically at the Initial

Case Management Hearing currently scheduled for Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.

Date:

_____________________________ The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins U.S. District Court Judge

3 David J. Lee, et al. v. Chase Manhattan Bank U.S.A., N.A., et al., Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re: Plaintiffs' Counsel's Telephonic Appearance at the Joint Case Management Hearing