Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 5:07-cv-04788-RS

Document 21

Filed 11/27/2007

Page 1 of 5

1 WALTERJ. LACK (CA SBN57ss0) (CA SBN 1ss805) PAULA. TRATNA 2 BRYAN C. PAYNE, (CA SBN230966) ENGSTROM, LIPSCOMB & LACK, P.C. Monica Boulevard,16thFloor J 10100Santa I-osAneeles. CA 90067-4107 (r tol 4 Telephdne: 552-3800

*E-FILED 11/27/97*

(310)552-9434 Facsimile:

5 6
(pro hac vice to be requestefi ANDREW SHER (TX SBN 007899623) THE SHER LAW FIRM P.L.L.C. 3100TimmonsLane,Suite 101 Houston,TX77027 Telephone: (713) 626-2100 Facsimile: (713)626-2101

8 9

ALEXANDER B. KLEIN, III (TX SBN 1155625)Qtro hac vice to be requested) THE KLEIN LAW FIRM 1 0 2000 The Lyric Center 440 Louisiana 1 1 Houston, TX11002 ( T e l e p h o n e : 7 1 3 )6 5 0 - 1 1 1 1 T2 Facsimile: (713)227-ll2l

1 3 Attomeys for Plaintiff
TRACY DeFATTA d/b/a BOOKKEEPING LTNLIMITED

t4 15 t6 17
TRACY DeFATTA d/b/a BOOKKEEPING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASENO. CO7 04788 RS
fSantaClara SuperiorCourt CaseNo. 107CV091687]

1 8 UNLIMITED, Individually and on behalf of
herself, and all others similarly situated,

19
Plaintiff,

20
V,

2L
INTUIT INC., and DOES 1 through 100,

22 inclusive, 23 24 25 26
Defendants.

STIPULATION AND xxxxxxxxxxxx ORDER [PROPOSEDI EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO SERVE AND FILE HER OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REMAND, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO ENGAGE IN LIMITED JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY Date: December14,2007 Time: 9:30 a.m. Ctrm:4

("Plaintiff') filed a Motionto Rernand WHEREAS, PlaintiffTracyDeFatta Case State to 27 17,2007; Courton October 28
/ELLHMDMI2}5526I1 @PFDesktop\::ODMA/PCDOCS 1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S TO REPLY TO DEFENDAIIT'SOPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REMAND

11,/26/2007 16:31 FAX

, @o t l : 1o 'o r

Case 5:07-cv-04788-RS

Document 21

Filed 11/27/2007

Page 2 of 5

I

WHEREAS, this Motion is curently scheduledto be heard on December14,2007; WHEREAS, Defendant Intuit, Inc.'s ("Defendant") Opposition to the Motion to Remand 's was due on November 21,20A7 ,and Plaintiff Reply is due on Novernber 28, 200t7;

2

4 5 6 7 I 9 l0

WHEREAS, Plaintiffseeks an extensionof time until November 30,2007 to file her Reply to Defendant' s Opposition; WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred and Defendant has agreedthat it will not be prejudiced by said extension and are agreeableto extending the Reply date to November 30,2001 date; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS FIEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the patties, through their respective counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff s Reply to Defendant's

or 1 1 Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to R.emand, in the Alternative, Permitting Plaintiffto Engage in
I.)
] L

Lirnited Jurisdictional Discoverv. is herebv extendedto November 30.2007.

l-J

t4

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ENGSTROM, LIPSCOMB & LACK THE SHER LAW FIRM P.L,L.C. THE KLEIN LAW FIRM

26. 1 5 DATED: November 2407 I6 t7 18 19

By BRYAN C. PAYNE ANDREW SHER ALEXANDER B. KLEIN, III Attorneysfor Plaintiff DATED: November26, 2007 QUINN EMANUEL URQUFIARTOLIVER & HEDGES,LLP

z0 zl
22
z3

24 25 26 27 28
:: ELLHMDM,/295526i I @PFDesktopt ODMA-/PCDOCSi

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REMAND

Case 5:07-cv-04788-RS

Document 21

Filed 11/27/2007

Page 3 of 5

1 2
J

ORDER PURSUANTTO THE ABOVE STIPULATIONOF THE PARTIES,IT IS SO 30, ORDERED:Plaintiffshallhaveuntil November 2007to serveandfile her Replyto Opposition Plaintiffs Motionto Remand. to Defendant's

4 5 6

DATED:
8 9 10 11

11/27/07
Richard Seeborg United StatesMagistrateJudge

t2 13 T4 15 T6 17 18 t9 20 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
@PFDesktop\r:ODMA/PCDOCS/ELLHMDM|29552611

STIPULATIONEXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S TO REPLY TO DEF'ENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REMAND

Case 5:07-cv-04788-RS

Document 21

Filed 11/27/2007

Page 4 of 5

1 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
)

) ss.
)

5 6 7

I am employedin the County of I-os Angeles, Stateof California. I am over the age of addressis 10100SantaMonica Boulevard, 18 and not a party to the within action; my business ','-the 16thFloor, Los Angeles,California90067-4107.On November ,2007,I served foregoing documentdescribedas STIPULATION AND [PROPOSEDI ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REMAND, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO ENGAGE IN in LIMITED JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY by placing a true copy thereof enclosed a as sealedenvelopeaddressed follows: ** SEE ATTACHED MAILING LIST **

(BY MAIL) I depositedsuch envelopein the mail at Los Angeles, California. The envelopewas mailed with postagethereonfully prepaid. I am "readily familiar" with the firm's 11 practiceof collection and processing for correspondence mailing. It is deposited with U.S. Postal Serviceon that samedate in the ordinary courseof business. I am awarethat on motion of party 12 date or postagemeter dateis more than served,serviceis presumedinvalid if postal cancellation one day after date of depositfor mailing in affidavit. t3 I4 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I causedsuchenvelopeto be deliveredby hand to the offices of the addressee(s).

10

15

(BY ELECTRONIC TRANSFER) I causedall of the pagesof the above-entitled X documents(PDF copy) to be transmitted to the recipients noted on the attachedmailing list via 16 electronictransfer (EMAIL). This documentwas transmittedby electronictransmission and reported without error " t7

18 _ L9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

(BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I causedsuch envelopeto be deliveredto FederalExpressfor overnight courier serviceto the offices of the addressee(s).

STATE: I declareunder penalty of perjury under the laws of the Stateof California that the above is true and correct. X FEDERAL: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this coufi at whose direction the service was made. I declareunder penalty of perjury under the laws of the Stateof California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executedon November t'_,2007 at Los Angeles, California.

MERLENEFLETCHER

27
28
IELLIIMDM/2955261 | :: @PFDesktop\ODMA/PCDOCS

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S TO REPLY TO DEFENDAIIT'SOPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REMAND

Case 5:07-cv-04788-RS

Document 21

Filed 11/27/2007

Page 5 of 5

I 2 3 4 5 6
I

SERVICE LIST DeFattav. Intuit, Inc., et al. USDC, Northern District CaseNo. C07 04788RS
[SantaClara County SuperiorCourt - Old Courthouse CaseNo. 107CV091687]

.A,ttorney
ClaudeM. Stern,Esq. Evette D. Perurlpacker, Esq. SayuriK. Sharper,Esq. QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 RedwoodShores,CA94065 Andrew Sher,Esq. THE SHER LAW FIRM PLLC 3100 Timmons Lane, Suite i01 Houston,TX77027

Phone/Fax
PH: (650) 801-5000 FX: (650) 801-5100 claudestern@quimemanuel. com evettepennvDacker@quinnemanuel. ooin sayurisharDer@quinnemanuel. com

Faity
Attorneys for Defendant. INTUIT INC.

8 9 10 11 t2

PH: (713)626-2100 FX: (713)626-2101 andrew(d)sher-law. con-r

Co-Counsel Plaintiff, for TRACY DeFATTA

Alexander Klein, III, Esq. B. THE KLEIN LAW FIRM 1 3 2000The Lyric Center 440 Louisiana I 4 Houston, TX77002

) P H : ( 7 1 36 5 0 -Il l 1 FX: (713) 227-1121 alex@thekleinlawficorr nn.

Co-Counsel Plaintiff. for TRACY DeFATTA

15 t6 T7 18 L9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
@PFDesktop\::ODMA/PCDOCS/ELLHMDM/295526/1 5

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTItr'F'S TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITIONTO MOTION TO REMAND