Case 5:07-cv-04787-JW
Document 14
Filed 01/10/2008
Page 1 of 5
WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, #084965 (CA) JONATHAN T. PECK, #I2303 (VA) SANYA HILL MAXION, #I8739 (WA) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (41 5) 625-5650 Facsimile : (41 5) 625-5657 Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, 1 Plaintiff, v. NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC. Defendants.
) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. C-07-4787-JW (RS)
1 ) 1
) ) ) ) )
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Civil Rights - En~ployment Discrimination JURY TRIAL DEMAND
1
NATURE OF THE ACTION
This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of race and retaliation and to provide appropriate relief to Charging Party Michael Cooke, an African American, who was adversely affected by such practices. Defendant Novellus Systems, Inc., subjected Mr. Cooke to racial harassment and a hostile work environment. In addition, Defendant subjected Mr. Cooke to retaliation (dischargellayoff) following his complaints about the racial harassment.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. $ $ 4 51, 1331, 1337,
1343, and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 706(f)(l) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. ยง2000e-5(f)(l) and (3) ("Title VII") and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991,42 U.S.C. 198 la.
FIRST AhlENDED COMP1,AINT
1
Case 5:07-cv-04787-JW
Document 14
Filed 01/10/2008
Page 2 of 5
2.
The unlawful employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed in the
City of San Jose, County of Santa Clara, California, which is within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division). INTRA DISTRICT ASSIGNMENT
3.
This action is appropriate for assignment to the San Jose venue because the
unlawful practices were and are being committed within Santa Clara County, and Defendant's principal place of business is in Santa Clara County. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC" or
"Commission"), is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation, and enforcement of Title VII and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 706(f)(l) and (3) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. g2000e-5 (1) and (3). 5. At all relevant times, Defendant Novellus Systems, Inc. ("Defendant") has
continuously been doing business in the State of California, in the City of San Jose, County of employed at least fifteen employees. Santa Clara, California, and has continuo~~sly
6.
At all relevant times, Defendant has continuously been an employer engaged in an
industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 701(b), (g), and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. g2000e-(b), (g), and (h). STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 7. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Michael Cooke filed a
charge of discrimination with the EEOC alleging violations of Title VII by Defendant. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled.
8.
Since at least January 2004, Defendant has engaged in unlawful employment
practices at its facility located in San Jose, California, in violation of Sections 703(a)(l) and 704(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. $$2000e-2(a) and 2000e3(a). These practices including subjecting Mr. Cooke to racial harassment and to an offensive, abusive, intimidating, and hostile work environment on account of his race, African American. The practices also include retaliating against and discharging (layoff) Mr. Cooke for complaining about the harassment made unlawful
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAIR'T
Case 5:07-cv-04787-JW
Document 14
Filed 01/10/2008
Page 3 of 5
by Title VII.
9.
The conduct included, inter alia, one of Defendant's assembly technicians (whose
name is known to Defendant), frequently making racially charged comments to Michael Cooke, playing and singing aloud to music lyrics that included anti-black racial epithets, such as the word "nigger" on a regular basis, demeaning Mr. Cooke by using the term "nigger please" and taunting Mr. Cooke by referring to California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger as "Arnold what's a nigger" in Mr. Cooke's presence. The racial harassment was intimidating, offensive and unwelcome to Mr. Cooke. The racial harassment was open and notorious and Defendant's management knew or should have known of the harassment because Mr. Cooke complained about the harassment to management numerous times. 10. Despite Defendant's knowledge of the racial harassment, the conduct continued
for approximately six months and no prompt or effective action was taken to end the harassment. 1 1. After Mr. Cooke complained about the racial harassment, Mr. Cooke was
subjected to acts of retaliation for his protected activity, including changing his work schedule and was ultimately terminated on October 15, 2004.
12.
The effect of the practices complained of above in paragraphs 8-1 1 has been to
deprive Mr. Cooke of equal employment opportunities and to otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee because of his race, African American.
13.
The unlawful employment practices complained of above in paragraphs 8-11 were
intentional. 14. The unlawful employment practices complained of above in paragraphs 8-1 I were
and are done with malice and/or reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Mr. Cooke.
//I/
///I
/I//
//I/
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAIST
3
Case 5:07-cv-04787-JW
Document 14
Filed 01/10/2008
Page 4 of 5
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court:
4 5
6
I
A.
Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its officers,
successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in discrimination against its employees, including harassment based on race and retaliation.
B.
Order Defendant to institute and cany out policies, practices, and
7
8 9
10
programs which prohibit racial harassment and retaliation, and which eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices.
C.
Order Defendant to make whole Mr. Cooke by providing compensation for past
and future pecuniary losses caused by the above unlawful conduct, including, but not limited to, back pay and benefits, prejudgment interest, reinstatement and/or front pay and other appropriate relief, in amounts to be detennined at trial. D. Order Defendant to make whole Mr. Cooke by providing compensation for past
11
12 13
14
and future non-pecuniary losses caused by the above unlawful conduct, including pain and suffering, emotional distress, indignity, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of self-esteem, and Iiumiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial.
15 16
17
18
E.
Order Defendant to pay Mr. Cooke punitive damages for its malicious and
reckless conduct described above, in amounts to be determined at trial.
F.
19
Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public
20
interest.
G.
Award the Commission its costs of this action.
I
FIRST AMENDED COX1PI.AINT
Case 5:07-cv-04787-JW
Document 14
Filed 01/10/2008
Page 5 of 5
JURY TRIAL DEMAND
The Con~~nission requests a jury trial on all questions of facts by its complaints.
RONALD S. COOPER General Counsel
JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel
GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of the General Counsel 1801 "L"Street N W Washington, D.C. 20507
!! DATED: A-
,2008 WILLIAM R. T ~ A Y O Regional ~ t t o m d
DATED:
///o
,2008
\{\$<\T.
ON THA T. PECK ~hp&isor~ Trial Attorney
\.''L(.
DATED:
f
SANYA HILL MAXION
"
L-
Senior Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 San Francisco, Cali fomia 94105 Telephone: (415) 625-5650
FIRST AMENDEI) COMPLAINT