Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 40.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 5, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 506 Words, 3,466 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/195972/19.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 40.5 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04830-VRW

Document 19

Filed 10/05/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Fred H. Altshuler (SBN 43878) Linda Lye (SBN 215584) Jamie L. Crook (SBN 245757) ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 421-7151 Facsimile: (415) 362-8064 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Robert M. Evitt, Sr., Joel Ortega, Loretta Evitt, and the proposed Plaintiff Class

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION ROBERT M. EVITT, Sr., JOEL ORTEGA, and LORETTA EVITT, on behalf of themselves and a class of those similarly situated, ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) MACK TRUCKS, INC., AND MACK ) HEALTH, DISABILITY, AND LIFE BENEFITS FOR UAW EMPLOYEES PLAN, ) ) ) Defendants. _____________________________________ ) Case No. C-07-4830 VRW CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, Case No. C-07-4830 VRW

Case 3:07-cv-04830-VRW

Document 19

Filed 10/05/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The above-captioned matter came before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. Upon consideration of Plaintiffs' motion, the evidence and legal arguments, and for good cause shown, Plaintiffs' motion for a Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. The Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims that any reduction or termination in their existing healthcare benefits without their consent violates Section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act ("LMRA"), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), and Section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. The Court further finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated that the balance of harms tips sharply in their favor because Plaintiffs and the members of the proposed class would suffer irreparable harm if Defendants were not enjoined from reducing or terminating Plaintiffs' benefits under the Mack Health, Disability and Life Benefits for UAW Employees Plan, whereas Defendant Mack Trucks, Inc. ("Mack") and Defendant Mack Health, Disability and Life Benefits for UAW Employees ("Mack Plan") will suffer no real harm if they are temporarily prohibited from implementing any modifications in Plaintiffs' health insurance coverage pending consideration of Plaintiffs' claims. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) The following class is hereby conditionally certified for purposes of this Preliminary Injunction: all persons who are retirees of Mack, their surviving spouses, or their dependents, and who are currently receiving medical benefits under the Mack Plan; (2) Defendants MACK and MACK PLAN, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all persons acting by, through, under, or in concert with Defendant, are HEREBY ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from making any reductions in or termination of the healthcare coverage of Plaintiffs and members of the conditionally certified class under the Mack Plan, to which Plaintiffs and members of the proposed class have not consented. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _______________________ ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, Case No. C-07-4830 VRW

1