Free Terminate Deadlines and Hearings - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04842-PJH

Document 9

Filed 12/28/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Matthew Franklin Jaksa (CA State Bar No. 248072) HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 268-2000 Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs, WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC.; INTERSCOPE RECORDS; MAVERICK RECORDING COMPANY; UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; BMG MUSIC; and VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., a Delaware corporation; INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a California general partnership; MAVERICK RECORDING COMPANY, a California joint venture; UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; BMG MUSIC, a New York general partnership; and VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE #2, Defendant. CASE NO. 3:07-CV-04842-MJJ The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Ex Parte Application and [Proposed] Order Case No. 3:07-cv-04842-MJJ
#33750 v1

Case 3:07-cv-04842-PJH

Document 9

Filed 12/28/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the case management conference currently set for January 8, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. to May 6, 2008. Plaintiffs further request, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4(m) and 6(b)(1), that Plaintiffs' time to serve the Summons and Complaint on Defendant be extended from January 18, 2008 to May 16, 2008. As set forth in more detail below and in the accompanying declaration, this application is made ex parte because Defendant's identity is not yet known to Plaintiffs. Declaration of Matthew Franklin Jaksa ("Jaksa Decl."), ¶ 5. Plaintiffs filed the Complaint against Defendant John Doe #2 ("Defendant") on September 20, 2007. Jaksa Decl., ¶ 2. Also on September 20, 2007, Plaintiffs filed their Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery, seeking the Court's permission to serve a Rule 45 subpoena on San Francisco State University ("SFSU") so that Plaintiffs could obtain information sufficient to identify Defendant. Jaksa Decl., ¶ 4. The Court has not yet ruled on Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery. Jaksa Decl., ¶ 5. If the Court grants Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery, Plaintiffs will attempt to determine Defendant's identity by serving a Rule 45 subpoena on SFSU. Jaksa Decl., ¶ 6. However, until that time, Plaintiffs cannot seek discovery from SFSU, and therefore cannot identify and serve Defendant or otherwise advance the present litigation. Jaksa Decl., ¶¶ 5, 7, 9. Given the foregoing circumstances, a case management conference is unnecessary at this time. Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request that the Court continue the case management conference currently set for January 8, 2008, at 2:00 p.m. to May 6, 2008. Furthermore, the original time period for Plaintiffs to serve the Summons and Complaint on Defendant will expire on January 18, 2008. Jaksa Decl., ¶ 8. Unless and until Plaintiffs learn Defendant's identity, Plaintiffs will be unable to amend the complaint to name Defendant, or serve the amended complaint on Defendant. Jaksa Decl., ¶ 9. Even if the Court were to grant Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery in the near future and Plaintiffs were then to immediately serve a subpoena on SFSU, it is unlikely that Plaintiffs would learn Defendant's identity before the original service deadline passes. Moreover, Plaintiffs would be left with little or
1 Ex Parte Application and [Proposed] Order Case No. 3:07-cv-04842-MJJ
#33750 v1

Case 3:07-cv-04842-PJH

Document 9

Filed 12/28/2007

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

no time to contact Defendant and attempt to resolve this matter or to amend the complaint to name Defendant and attempt to serve the amended complaint. Therefore, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the time to serve the Summons and Complaint on Defendant be extended to May 16, 2008. Dated: December 20, 2007 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP By: /s/ Matthew Franklin Jaksa______ MATTHEW FRANKLIN JAKSA Attorney for Plaintiffs

ORDER Good cause having been shown: IT IS ORDERED that the case management conference currently set for January 8, 2008, at 2:00 p.m. be continued to May 6, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4(m) and 6(b)(1), Plaintiffs' time to serve the Summons and Complaint on Defendant be extended to May 16, 2008.

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

12/21/2007 Dated: ___________________

UNIT ED

21

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

2 Ex Parte Application and [Proposed] Order Case No. 3:07-cv-04842-MJJ
#33750 v1

A

C

LI

FO

ED By: _____________________________ ORDER S SO Martin J. Jenkins IT I Honorable United States District Judge ins n J. Jenk e Marti Judg
R NIA

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

NO

RT

H