Case 3:07-cv-04869-CRB
Document 8
Filed 01/03/2008
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
INTERSCOPE RECORDS, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant. /
No. C07-04869 MJJ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE IMMEDIATE DISCOVERY
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Before the Court is Plaintiffs' ex parte Motion For Leave To Take Immediate Discovery. (Docket No. 3.) Upon consideration of the Motion and the supporting papers, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court GRANTS the Motion as follows: The Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs may serve immediate discovery on University of San Francisco to obtain the identity of the John Doe defendant by serving a Rule 45 subpoena that seeks information sufficient to identify the John Doe defendant, including the defendant's name, address, telephone number, e-mail address, and Media Access Control address. The subpoena shall be narrowly tailored to seek only such identifying information, and shall not seek other discovery directed at the merits of the case. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that any information disclosed to Plaintiffs in response to the Rule 45 subpoena shall be used by Plaintiffs solely for the purpose of protecting Plaintiffs' rights under the Copyright Act as set forth in the Complaint. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that, if and when University of San Francisco is served
Case 3:07-cv-04869-CRB
Document 8
Filed 01/03/2008
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
with a subpoena, within five (5) business days thereof it shall give written notice, which can include use of e-mail, to the subscriber whose identity is requested in the subpoena. If University of San Francisco and/or the John Doe defendant wish to move to quash the subpoena, they shall do so before the return date of the subpoena, which shall be at least twenty-five (25) business days from the date of service. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that, if and when University of San Francisco is served with a subpoena, University of San Francisco shall preserve the data and information sought in the subpoena pending resolution of any timely filed motion to quash. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that counsel for Plaintiffs shall provide a copy of this Order to University of San Francisco when the subpoena is served.
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 2, 2008 MARTIN J. JENKINS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2