Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 99.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 400 Words, 2,496 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196082/3-1.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 99.4 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04908-MHP

Document 3

Filed 11/16/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 KATHARINE H. PARKER, Admission Pro Hac Vice Pending 2 1585 Broadway
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP New York, NY 10036-8299 Facsimile: 212.969.2900

3 Telephone: 212.969.3009 4 [email protected]

5 DAWN M. IRIZARRY, SBN 223303 6 2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor 7 Telephone: (310) 557-2900 8 [email protected] 9 Attorneys for Defendant 10 Plan 11 12 13 14 JOHN DOE, 15 16
v. DISABILITY PLAN, Defendant. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Cendant Corporation Short Term Disability Facsimile: (310) 557-2193 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

17 CENDANT CORPORATION SHORT TERM 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
8086/76946-001 Current/10345470v2

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. C 07- 04908 MHP STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C07-04908 MHP

Case 3:07-cv-04908-MHP

Document 3

Filed 11/16/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff John Doe and Defendant Cendant Corporation Short Term Disability Plan ("Defendant") that Defendant's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to December 3, 2007. PROSKAUER ROSE LLP By: /s/ Dawn M. Irizarry Dawn M. Irizarry Attorneys for Defendant Cendant Corporation Short Term Disability Plan LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C. By: /s/ Nina Wasow (Signature attached as Exhibit A) Nina Wasow Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN DOE

6 Dated: November___, 2007 7 8 9 10 Dated: November___, 2007 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
8086/76946-001 Current/10345470v2

-2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C07-04908 MHP

Case 3:07-cv-04908-MHP

Document 3

Filed 11/16/2007

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: November ____, 2007 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
8086/76946-001 Current/10345470v2

[PROPOSED] ORDER Having read and considered the Stipulation of the parties, and good causing appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to and including December 3, 2007.

_________________________________ Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel

3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C07-04908 MHP