Free Sentencing Memorandum - District Court of California - California

Case 5:07-cr-00610-JF

Document 29-4

Filed 05/01/2008

Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT C
March 3, 2008 email communications among defense counsel, the AUSA and the Probation Officer, addressing restitution

Case 5:07-cr-00610-JF

Document 29-4

Filed 05/01/2008

Page1 of 1 Page 2 of 4

Mark Vermeulen From: Mark Vermeulen [[email protected]]
Sent: To: Monday, March 03, 20084:18 PM '[email protected]'

Cc: 'Fazioli, Joseph (USACAN)' Subject: Bernadette Escue - restitution amount

Lori: attached the following documents are from disc
.

Letter datedAugust6, 2004 from ChubbGroupto AUSA Matt Harris (noting lossin the amount of $90,297) . "Release Assignment"datedJune8, 2004(signedby Network on July 26, 2004,noting and paymentto Network of $40,297.53, with a hand-writtennotationora $50,000deductible)

By thesedocuments, seems it lossandrestitutionshouldbe set at $90,297.53. You notedthat your belief in the draft PSRthat restitu~onequals$95,619.21 (draft PSR,p. 5,' 20) was derivedfrom notesprovidedto you by Joeor the caseagent. I don't havethosenotes. Please provide thoseto me if therewill continueto be a controversy over whetherrestitutionis setat $90,297.53. Thanks. Mark Mark R. Venneulen Attorney at Law 755 Florida Street #4 SanFrancisco, CA 94110.2044 415.824.7533 415.824.4833 (fax) [email protected]

4/22/2008

Case 5:07-cr-00610-JF

Document 29-4

Filed 05/01/2008

Page 3 of Page1 of 2 4

Mark Vermeulen
From: Sent: Mark Vermeulen [[email protected]] Monday, March 03, 20084:50 PM

To: 'Fazioli, Joseph (USACAN)'; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: Bernadette Escue - restitution amount

Joe: Got jt. The typewrittenpageswith the handwrittennoteson the final page. Sorry for my oversight,and thanksfor clarifying. Let me/usknow what you think further. Mark
From: Fazioli, Joseph (USACAN)[mailto:[email protected]]
Original Message

Sent: Monday, March 03, 20084:41 PM To: Mark Vermeulen; [email protected]

Subject: RE:Bernadette Escue restitutionamount

-

Mark, You do havethe notesfor the $95,69.21figure, they areright at the front of the materialsI sentto Lori T on 11/27/07 subsequently and faxedto you in their entiretyon 1/10/08(the spreadsheet the 95K figure for is right after the letter to Ms. Timmons,andthe 302 dated10/19/07). That being said, let metake a look at the documents seewhat our position will be regardingwhat shouldbe the appropriate to restitution amount. Joe

From: Mark Venneulen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 03, 20084:18 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Fazioli, Joseph (USACAN) Subject: Bernadette Escue restitutionamount

-

Lori:
Following our conversation, attached the following documents are from discovery(contained in the initial discoveryI received,andhand-numbered Batespages32-33): as . Letter datedAugust 6, 2004 from ChubbGroupto AUSA Matt Harris (noting lossin the amountof $90,297) . "ReleaseandAssignment"datedJune8, 2004 (signedby Network on July 26, 2004, noting paymentto Network of $40,297.53, with a hand-writtennotationof a $50,000 deductible) By thesedocuments, seems it loss andrestitutionshouldbe set at $90,297.53. You notedthat your belief in the draft PSRthat restitutionequals$95,619.21 (draft PSR,p. 5, ~ 20) wasderivedfrom notesprovidedto you by Joeor the caseagent. I don't havethosenotes.

Case 5:07-cr-00610-JF

Document 29-4

Filed 05/01/2008

Page 4 ofPage of2 4 2

Please providethoseto me if therewill continueto be a controversyover whetherrestitutionis setat $90,297.53.

Thanks. Mark
Mark R. Vemleulen Attorney at Law 755 Florida Street #4 SanFrancisco. CA 94110.20. 94110.2044 415.824.7533 415.824.4833 (fax) [email protected]