Free Request for Judicial Notice - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04911-CRB

Document 52

Filed 11/21/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Timothy T. Scott (SBN 126971) [email protected] Geoffrey M. Ezgar (SBN 184243) [email protected] Paul L. Yanosy (SBN 233014) [email protected] SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 Paul E. Kalb, M.D. SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 736-8000 Facsimile: (202) 736-8711 Nina M. Gussack Andrew R. Rogoff PEPPER HAMILTON LLP 3000 Two Logan Square Eighteenth and Arch Streets Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799 Telephone: (215) 981-4000 Facsimile: (215) 981-4750 Attorneys For Defendant ELI LILLY AND COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. JAYDEEN VICENTE and JAYDEEN VICENTE Individually, Relators, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 07-cv-04911-CRB Assigned to: Hon. Charles R. Breyer SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS Date: December 7, 2007 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant.

SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
SF1 1478023v.1

Case 3:07-cv-04911-CRB

Document 52

Filed 11/21/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly") hereby requests that this Court take judicial notice of the facts and documents listed below and attached hereto as exhibits, pursuant to Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, for purposes of Lilly's previously filed motion to dismiss the complaint of qui tam plaintiff Jaydeen Vicente in the above-entitled action. 1. Request No. 1: Margaret Cronin Fisk, Lilly Fraudulently Marketed Zyprexa,

Montana Claims, BLOOMBERG NEWS, Mar. 12, 2007, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. This Court may properly take judicial notice of publicly available media publications. Ritter v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 58 F. 3d 454 (9th Cir. 1995); Washington Post v. Robinson, 935 F. 2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (taking judicial notice of a newspaper article to show information was in the public domain). Respectfully submitted, Dated: November 21, 2007 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: /s/ Timothy T. Scott Timothy T. Scott Attorneys For Defendant ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
SF1 1478023v.1