Free Notice (Other) - District Court of California - California


File Size: 31.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 11, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 434 Words, 2,759 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196124/15.pdf

Download Notice (Other) - District Court of California ( 31.6 kB)


Preview Notice (Other) - District Court of California
Case 5:07-cv-04507-JF

Document 15

Filed 10/11/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

LINDA SHAO (CA 182768) LAW OFFICE OF LINDA SHAO, APLC 28 North First Street, Suite 618 San Jose, CA 95131 Phone: 408-873-3888 Fax: 408-873-3889 Attorney for Defendant PTI Global Inc. Limited Scope of Representation for filing this Opposition only Specially appearing only UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ACTICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC Case No. C07-4507BZ NOTICE OF ERRATA RE DECLARATION OF LINDA SHAO SUPPORTING PTI GLOBAL INC'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR TRO and MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

9 10 11 12 13 14 TO THE COURT AND PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Acticon vs. Pretec et al., Case No. C07-04507 BZ Page 1 Decl. Shao supporting Opposition to motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction

Plaintiff, vs. PRETEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, et al. Defendants

Please take notice that during a rush in preparing PTI's Opposition to Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction, there is inadvertent clerical error contained in Declaration of Linda Shao as follows: The first 8 lines of Paragraph 7 shown on Page Two should be deleted but inadvertently was not deleted: The deleted portion should be: "From my reading of the Complaint, Plaintiff's Complaint is defective on its face for the very basic reason that Plaintiff misled the Court that Pretec Electronics Corporation is the same as Pretec Technology Inc. (the latter is the true predecessor of PTI Global, Inc.) and speculate that there were manufacturing equipments, remaining corporate funds or assets being transferred from Pretec Electronics Corporaiton to PTI Global, Inc. Plaintiff's counsel made a correct statement of Paragraph 35 but in Paragraphs 19 (Complaint, Page 7, Lines 5-8), Paragraph 16 (Complaint, Page 4, Line 19), Paragraph 15 (Complaint, Page 4, Line 12) made inconsistent statement of fact by mistaking Pretec Electronics Corporation being the predecessor of PTI Global, Inc."

Case 5:07-cv-04507-JF

Document 15

Filed 10/11/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Acticon vs. Pretec et al., Case No. C07-04507 BZ Page 2 Decl. Shao supporting Opposition to motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction

I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in San Jose, California on October 11, 2007. Dated: October 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted, Law Offices of Linda Shao, APLC By: /s/ Linda Shao Linda Shao, Esq. Attorney for Defendant PTI Global, Inc. Limited Scope of Representation for this Opposition only Specially appearing only