Case 3:07-cv-04878-MMC
Document 12
Filed 12/28/2007
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Matthew Franklin Jaksa (CA State Bar No. 248072) HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 268-2000 Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ARISTA RECORDS LLC; UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; and SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ARISTA RECORDS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; and SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.
CASE NO. :07-CV-04878-MMC Honorable Maxine M. Chesney EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Ex Parte Application to Continue CMC and [Proposed] Order Case No. :07-cv-04878-MMC
#34560 v1
Case 3:07-cv-04878-MMC
Document 12
Filed 12/28/2007
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the case management conference currently set for January 4, 2008, at 10:30 a.m. to April 4, 2008. Plaintiffs filed the Complaint against Defendant John Doe ("Defendant") on September 20, 2007. Also on September 20, 2007, Plaintiffs filed their Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery seeking the Court's permission to serve a Rule 45 subpoena on California State University Monterey Bay ("Cal State Monterey Bay"), so that Plaintiffs could obtain information sufficient to identify Defendant. On October 1, 2007, this Court issued its Order Granting Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery authorizing Plaintiffs to serve a Rule 45 subpoena on Cal State Monterey Bay. On November 30, 2007, Cal State Monterey Bay responded to Plaintiffs' subpoena, providing Plaintiffs with identifying information including Defendant's name, telephone number, and address. Now that Plaintiffs know Defendant's identity, and in hopes of avoiding further litigation, Plaintiffs have sent a letter to Defendant asking her to contact Plaintiffs regarding possible settlement of this matter. If the parties do not reach a settlement, Plaintiffs will file an amended complaint naming Defendant personally. Given the foregoing circumstances, and because there is not yet a named defendant in this case, a case management conference is unnecessary at this time. Plaintiffs therefore request that the Court continue the case management conference currently set for January 4, 2008, at 10:20 a.m. to April 4, 2008. Dated: December 20, 2007 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP
By: _________/s/ Matthew Franklin Jaksa___ MATTHEW FRANKLIN JAKSA Attorney for Plaintiffs
1 Ex Parte Application to Continue CMC and [Proposed] Order Case No. :07-cv-04878-MMC
#34560 v1
Case 3:07-cv-04878-MMC
Document 12
Filed 12/28/2007
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 December 28, 2007 Dated: ___________________ Good cause having been shown:
ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the case management conference currently set for January 4, 2008, at 10:30 a.m. be continued to April 4, 2008.
By: _____________________________ Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge
1 Ex Parte Application to Continue CMC and [Proposed] Order Case No. :07-cv-04878-MMC
#34560 v1