Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 32.8 kB
Pages: 4
Date: January 23, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,091 Words, 7,007 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196139/11.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 32.8 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 5:07-cv-04856-JF

Document 11

Filed 01/23/2008

Page 1 of 4 **E-filed 1/23/08**

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Matthew Franklin Jaksa (CA State Bar No. 248072) HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 268-2000 Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs, UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; BMG MUSIC; ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION; and SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; BMG MUSIC, a New York general partnership; ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE #5, Defendant.

CASE NO. 5:07-CV-04856-JF Honorable Jeremy Fogel EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND TIME TO SERVE --------------DEFENDANT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Ex Parte Application to Continue CMC and Extend Time to Serve Defendant and [Proposed] Order Case No. 5:07-cv-04856-JF
#34942 v1

Case 5:07-cv-04856-JF

Document 11

Filed 01/23/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the case management conference currently set for February 15, 2008, at 10:30 a.m. to May 16, 2008. Plaintiffs further request, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4(m) and 6(b)(1)(A), that the Court grant an additional 90 days to serve Defendant with the Summons and Complaint. As further explained below, Plaintiffs believe they have discovered the identity of the Doe defendant in this case, but do not have sufficient time to serve Defendant with an amended complaint naming Defendant individually before the current deadline for service expires. In support of their request, Plaintiffs state as follows:

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 Ex Parte Application to Continue CMC and Extend Time to Serve Defendant and [Proposed] Order Case No. 5:07-cv-04856-JF
#34942 v1

1.

The initial case management conference is set for February 15, 2008, at 10:30

a.m., as previously continued by the Court pursuant to the Clerk's Notice filed on December 19, 2007. The current deadline for service of process is January 18, 2008. 2. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint for Copyright Infringement against Defendant

John Doe #5 ("Defendant") on September 20, 2007. Plaintiffs did not have sufficient identifying information to name Defendant in the Complaint, but were able to identify Defendant by the Internet Protocol address assigned to Defendant by Defendant's Internet Service Provider ("ISP") ­ here, San Francisco State University. 3. In order to determine Defendant's true name and identity, Plaintiffs filed their

Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery on September 20, 2007, requesting that the Court enter an Order allowing Plaintiffs to serve a Rule 45 subpoena on the ISP. 4. The Court entered an Order for Leave to take Immediate Discovery on

October 3, 2007, which was promptly served upon the ISP along with a Rule 45 subpoena. On November 16, 2007, the ISP responded to Plaintiffs' subpoena, identifying Tiffany Ellaina Turner and providing Plaintiffs with contact information including Ms. Turner's telephone number and address.

Case 5:07-cv-04856-JF

Document 11

Filed 01/23/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5.

On December 4, 2007, Plaintiffs sent a letter to Ms. Turner notifying her of

their claims for copyright infringement and encouraging her to make contact to attempt to amicably resolve this matter. To date, Plaintiffs have not received a response to this letter, and Plaintiffs have been unsuccessful in their further attempts to contact Ms. Turner by telephone and e-mail. 6. Plaintiffs have prepared a First Amended Complaint naming Ms. Turner

individually as the defendant, and intend to file the same in the next several days. However, Plaintiffs do not have sufficient time to effectuate service by the current service deadline of January 18. Therefore, Plaintiffs respectfully request an additional 90 days to effectuate service. 7. Given the circumstances of this case, Plaintiffs also request that the case

management conference be continued to May 16, 2008 to allow Plaintiffs adequate time to effectuate 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2 Ex Parte Application to Continue CMC and Extend Time to Serve Defendant and [Proposed] Order Case No. 5:07-cv-04856-JF
#34942 v1

service in time for Defendant to retain counsel and file a response. 8. Plaintiffs submit that their efforts to give written notice to Ms. Turner of their

claim and subsequent efforts to contact her and resolve the case before naming her in the lawsuit constitute good cause for any delay in perfecting service. See Ritts v. Dealers Alliance Credit Corp., 989 F. Supp. 1475, 1479 (N.D. Ga. 1997) (stating good cause standard for service extensions). Here, Plaintiffs have acted in good faith to try to settle this matter with Ms. Turner without potentially damaging her credit by naming her in the suit as well as attempting to avoid the cost of further litigation for both parties. Moreover, unlike a traditional case in which the defendant is known by name and efforts to serve can begin immediately after filing the complaint, in this case Plaintiffs first had to obtain the identity of the defendant through the subpoena to the ISP. This Court has discretion to enlarge the time to serve even where there is no good cause shown. Henderson v. United States, 517 U.S. 654, 658 n. 5 (1996). 9. Because the copyright infringements here occurred in 2007, the three-year

limitations period for these claims has not expired. See 17 U.S.C. § 507(b) (2000). There can thus be no prejudice to the Defendant from any delay in serving the Complaint.

Case 5:07-cv-04856-JF

Document 11

Filed 01/23/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

10.

Plaintiffs will provide the Defendant with a copy of this request and any Order

concerning this request when service of process occurs.

Dated: January 17, 2008

HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP

By: __________/s/ Matthew Franklin Jaksa___ MATTHEW FRANKLIN JAKSA Attorney for Plaintiffs

---------------[PROPOSED] ORDER Good cause having been shown: IT IS ORDERED that the case management conference currently set for February 15, 2008, at 10:30 a.m. be continued to May 16, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4(m) and 6(b)(1), Plaintiffs' time to serve the Summons and Complaint on Defendant be extended to April 17, 2008.

1/23/08 Dated: ___________________

By: _____________________________ Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge

3 Ex Parte Application to Continue CMC and Extend Time to Serve Defendant and [Proposed] Order Case No. 5:07-cv-04856-JF
#34942 v1