Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04899-MMC

Document 11

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10

MICHAEL B. NORDLOF,

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15

) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) KEN CLARK, Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) ______________________________ )

No. C 07-4899 MMC (PR) ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETITION; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Docket No. 10)

On September 21, 2007, petitioner, a California prisoner incarcerated at Corcoran
16

State Prison and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled petition for a writ of habeas corpus
17

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 10, 2008, after reviewing the petition, the Court
18

ordered respondent to file an answer showing cause why the petition should not be granted,
19

or in the alternative, a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds. On July 11, 2008, the Court
20

granted respondent an extension of time to September 7, 2008, to respond to the petition. On
21

July 23, 2008, petitioner filed a motion to amend the petition to include fourteen new claims
22

for relief.
23

The Civil Rule governing pleading amendments, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15,
24

made applicable to habeas proceedings by 28 U.S.C. § 2242, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
25

81(a)(2), and Habeas Corpus Rule 11, allows pleading amendments with leave of court any
26

time during a proceeding. Mayle v. Felix, 545 U.S. 644, 654-55 (2005) (citing Fed. R. Civ.
27

P. 15(a)). Before a responsive pleading is served, pleadings may be amended once as a
28

matter of course. Id. at 655. As respondent has not yet filed a responsive pleading to the

Case 3:07-cv-04899-MMC

Document 11

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

petition herein, petitioner's motion to amend the petition is hereby GRANTED. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby SETS the following briefing schedule. Within ninety (90) days of the date this order is filed, respondent shall file a response to the amended petition. Within thirty days of the date such response is filed, petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on respondent a responsive pleading thereto. If respondent files a motion to dismiss, respondent shall file a reply to petitioner's opposition within fifteen days of the date such opposition is filed. This order terminates Docket No. 10. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 19, 2008 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2