Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 9.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 320 Words, 1,914 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196162/13.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 9.6 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 5:07-cv-04910-JF

Document 13

Filed 10/12/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4

PETER N. LAMBERTO, State Bar No. 061813 LAMBERTO & KREGER 160 West Santa Clara, Suite 1050 San Jose, CA 95113-2311 Telephone: (408) 999-0300 Facsimile: (408) 999-0301 Attorneys for Plaintiff LISAMARIE BRAYDEN

5 6 7 8 9 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LISAMARIE BRAYDEN Plaintiff,

Case No. C 07-04910 JF [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND [28 U.S.C. section 1447(c)] Date: December 14, 2007 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 3; Hon. Jeremy Fogel /

11

vs.
12 13 14

PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCING, INC., MARK BLANCHARD, JOE HAMBY, BRUCE ROBINSON, AND DOES 1-50 AND DOES 1-50, Defendants.

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That this action is hereby ordered Remanded to California Superior Court, Monterey County, on the basis of no federal diversity jurisdiction. Defendants to pay plaintiff the amount of $___________ in attorneys fees within 10 days.

Dated: Hon. Jeremy Fogel

Case 5:07-cv-04910-JF

Document 13

Filed 10/12/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 Please take notice that on December 14, 2007 at 3 9:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, in Department 3, at the United States 4 District Court, Northern District, located at 280 S. First St., San Jose, CA 95113, plaintiff shall, 5 and hereby does, move to remand this matter to California Superior Court, County of Monterey, 6 following its removal by defendants, on the basis of a lack of a Federal diversity jurisdiction. This 7 motion is based on this Notice of Motion, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed in 8 support of this motion, and all of the pleadings and papers on file in this action. 9 10 Dated: October 12, 2007 11 12 By: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2PETER N. LAMBERTO Attorneys for Plaintiff LAMBERTO & KREGER