Free ADR Clerks Notice - District Court of California - California


File Size: 22.0 kB
Pages: 5
Date: July 3, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 761 Words, 4,773 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196172/13.pdf

Download ADR Clerks Notice - District Court of California ( 22.0 kB)


Preview ADR Clerks Notice - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04823-VRW

Document 13

Filed 07/03/2008

Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court
Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of California McClellan-Chambers, Plaintiff(s), v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Defendant(s). 07-01823 SBA NOTICE RE: NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification and either a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting an ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall Meet and Confer forthwith in an attempt to agree on an ADR process for this matter. Thereafter, counsel, on behalf of themselves and each party, promptly shall file an ADR Certification and either 1) a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process, or 2) a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (Civil L.R. 16-8(b), ADR L. R. 3-5(b) Civil L.R. 16-8(c), ADR L. R. 3-5(c), (d)). (These forms are available at www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov.)

Further, in accordance with ADR L.R. 3-5(e) counsel shall concurrently provide a copy of all documents filed pursuant to this notice directly to the ADR Unit either by fax (415-522-4112), hand delivery (ADR Program, USDC, Northern District of California, Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 07-01823 SBA -1-

Case 3:07-cv-04823-VRW

Document 13

Filed 07/03/2008

Page 2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court
Northern District of California

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, San Francisco, California), or by PDF attachment to an e-mail directed to [email protected].

It is the responsibility of counsel to schedule an ADR Phone Conference, if required, to occur before the Case Management Conference.

Dated: July 3, 2008 RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Lisa Salvetti /s/ ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-2146 [email protected]

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 07-01823 SBA -2-

Case 3:07-cv-04823-VRW

Document 13

Filed 07/03/2008

Page 3 of 5

PROOF OF SERVICE Case Name: Case Number: McClellan-Chambers v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd 07-01823 SBA

I declare that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the action. My business address is: ADR Program United States District Court Norther District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue Floor 16 San Francisco, CA 94102 On July 3, 2008, I served a true and correct copy of: Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order [X] electronically, I caused said documents to be transmitted using ECF as specified by General Order No. 45 to the following parties: Bryan Matthew Kreft Steyer, Lowenthal, Boodrookas, Alvarez & Smith LLP One California Street, Third Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 [email protected] Richard Quintus Roberts Law Firm, PA 20 Rahling Circle P.O. Box 241790 Little Rock, AR 72223 Allan Steyer Steyer Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith LLP One California Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 [email protected] Michael L. Roberts Roberts Law Firm, PA 20 Rahling Circle

Case 3:07-cv-04823-VRW

Document 13

Filed 07/03/2008

Page 4 of 5

P.O. Box 241790 Little Rock, AR 72223-1790 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Mona Solouki Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP Four Embarcadero 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 [email protected] Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. , Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc. , Micron Technology, Inc. , Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. , Renesas Technology Corporation , Renesas Technology America, Inc. , Toshiba Corporation , Toshiba America Corporation , Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. , Hitachi, Ltd. , Hitachi America, Ltd. ,

Case 3:07-cv-04823-VRW

Document 13

Filed 07/03/2008

Page 5 of 5

Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. , Mitsubishi Electric Corporation , Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. , Mosel Vitelic Corporation , Mosel Vitelic Corporation (USA) , Winbond Electronics Corporation , Winbond Electronics Corporation America ,

[ ] by Facsimile, I caused said documents to be transmitted to the following parties by fax machine: [ ] by U. S. Mail, I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid in the United States Post Office Mail Box in San Francisco, California, addressed as follows:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on July 3, 2008 in San Francisco, California. RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Lisa Salvetti /s/ ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-2146 [email protected]