Free ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options - District Court of California - California


File Size: 64.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 15, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 350 Words, 2,325 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196197/21.pdf

Download ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options - District Court of California ( 64.5 kB)


Preview ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options - District Court of California
Case 5:07-cv-04987-JF

Document 21

Filed 01/15/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (#88625) NORA FRIMANN, Chief Trial Attorney (#93249) MICHAEL R. GROVES, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#85620) STEVEN B. DIPPELL, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#121217) Office of the City Attorney 200 East Santa Clara Street San Jose, California 95113-1905 Telephone: (408) 535-1900 Facsimile: (408) 998-3131 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SAN JOSE, OFFICER PFEIFER, OFFICER NATIVIDAD, OFFICER WEIR, and OFFICER HIGGINS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS VAN ZANDT, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF SAN JOSE, OFFICERS PFEIFER, NATIVIDAD, WEIR, and HIGGINS, individually and as employees of the CITY OF SAN JOSE, TARGET STORES, INC., THE WESTFIELD GROUP, PROFESSIONAL SECURITY CONSULTANTS, and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants.

CASE NO.: C07-04987 JF

ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has: (1) Read the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California" on the Court's ADR Internet site www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov (Limited printed copies are available from the clerk's officer for parties in cases not subject to the court's Electronic Case Filing program (ECF) under General Order 45); (2) Discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities; and // 1
ADR Certification by Parties & Counsel C07-04987 JF
457988

Case 5:07-cv-04987-JF

Document 21

Filed 01/15/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

(3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution options. Dated: January 15, 2008 ________ _________/s/______________________ Defendants, CITY OF SAN JOSE, OFFICER PFEIFER, OFFICER NATIVIDAD, OFFICER WEIR, and OFFICER HIGGINS ________ _________/s/______________________ MICHAEL R. GROVES, Sr. Deputy City Attorney Attorney for Defendants, CITY OF SAN JOSE, OFFICER PFEIFER, OFFICER NATIVIDAD, OFFICER WEIR, and OFFICER HIGGINS

Dated: January 15, 2008

2
ADR Certification by Parties & Counsel C07-04987 JF
457988