Case 1:04-cv—00833-KAJ Document 195-4 Filed 01/27/2006 Page 1 014
Case 1 :04-cv—00833-KAJ Document 195-4 Filed 01/27/2006 Page 2 of 4
12/15/2005 10:34 FAX 312 913 0002 MZBHB 001
mlb McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert L Berghoff r.l.l= ·
Fax transmittal
Tn Michael S. Gugig nate December 15, 2005 ·
Company Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP From Joshua R. Rich
Fax 212.768.5BDO Direct 312 9].3 2133
Phone Email [email protected]
Gopyro C/lVl 1144/2
Pages, 3
with cover
no Pharmacia & Upjohn Company v. Sicor lnc.
. . Civil Action No. 04-833
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
SDG South Wacker Drlvr 312 913 OU01 phone This transmittal is strictly for delivery Please contactus if all pages are
Chicezv. lllirwis 60606-6709 312 913 0002 fail nnly to the person listed above. I1 may not received. lf you received this talc
· www.mbhb.com contain confidential or privileged in error. please contact us to
information, the disclosure of which is arrange for retum ofthe document
nrnhihiterl ,
PAGE 113 * RCVD AT 1211512995 9:32:21 Alvl [Central Standard Time]* SVR:CHI2KRF91l22 * DNlS:477T* CSlD:312 913 9992* DURATION (mm-ss):9949 _
Case 1 :04-cv—00833-KAJ Document 195-4 Filed 01/27/2006 Page 3 of 4
12/15/2005 10:34 FAX 312 010 0002 mans ei 002
mb McDonnell Buehnen Hulbert & Berghnff 1.u= 000 suwn wma Drive 012 s10 0001 pnuna
I I Chicago. Illinois 60606-6705 312 913 0002 fax
www.mbhb.c0m
December 15, 2005
Sent Via Facsimile (212) 7686800
Michael S. Gugig
Sonnenscheln Nath & Rosenthal LLP
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 100201089
Re: Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC v. Sicor Inc.
Civil Action No. 04833 KM
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Dear Mike:
We were surprised to receive your e—mail message of last night indicating that it would not
be possible for Sicor to review the revised log of contested privileged documents in time to
incorporate the changes in Sic0r's motion to compel. Given that Sicor identified perceived
deficiencies only last Friday, we believe that provision of the log on Wednesday was
appropriate. Furthermore, given our provision ofthe log in Excel format for Slcor's
convenience, we believe the timing is sufficient to allow Sicor to be able to observe that
most of the dispute between the parties should now be moot. Nonetheless, we look
forward to being able to tell the Court in several weeks that Slcor has withdrawn a
significant part of its motion to compel.
We still have not received a revised privilege log from Sicor. As you know, we identified the
deficiencies inthe log first on October 31, 2005 and discussed them at greater length on
Monday. Please let us know if Sicor will be providing such a log before the deadline for
filing motions to compel privileged documents and, if so, when we will receive it.
PAGE 213* RCVD AT 1211512995 9:32:21 Alll [Central Standard Time]* SVR:CHl2KRF91l22* DNlS:4TTT * CSlD:312 913 9992* DURATION (mm-ss):9949
._ Case 1 :04-cv—00833-KAJ Document 195-4 Filed 01/27/2006 Page 4 of 4
12/15/2005 10:34 FAX 312 010 0002 amine ra 00:;
Please let us know if you have any questions.
’ Very truly yours,
&1·a—.—‘1:ea.____
Joshua R. Rich
312-913-21323
[email protected]
M¤D0nneIlBu2hnen Hulhert&Bargh¤fTLLP Michael S. Gugig Page2 December 15, 2005
PAGE 313 * RCVD AT 1211512995 9:32:21 All [Central Standard Time] * SVR:CHI2KRF91l22* DNIS:4777* CSID:312 913 9992* DURATION (mm-ss):9949
Case 1:04-cv-00833-KAJ
Document 195-4
Filed 01/27/2006
Page 1 of 4
Case 1:04-cv-00833-KAJ
Document 195-4
Filed 01/27/2006
Page 2 of 4
Case 1:04-cv-00833-KAJ
Document 195-4
Filed 01/27/2006
Page 3 of 4
Case 1:04-cv-00833-KAJ
Document 195-4
Filed 01/27/2006
Page 4 of 4