Free Declaration in Support - District Court of California - California


File Size: 1,390.0 kB
Pages: 139
Date: March 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 10,083 Words, 65,586 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196201/20-2.pdf

Download Declaration in Support - District Court of California ( 1,390.0 kB)


Preview Declaration in Support - District Court of California
Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 1 of 139

Exhibit A

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 2 of 139

THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS INC

FORM S-1/A
(Securities Registration Statement)

Filed 2/3/2005

Address Telephone CIK Fiscal Year

1300 SEAPORT BOULEVARD REDWOOD CITY, California 94063 650 474 8200 0001183765 12/31

Case Table of Contents

4:07-cv-04972-CW

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 3 of 139
Registration No. 333-114376

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 3, 2005

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under

The Securities Act of 1933

THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact Name of Corporation as Specified in Its Charter)

1300 Seaport Boulevard Redwood City, California 94063
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

2834
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)

94-3409596
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Harold E. Selick, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer 1300 Seaport Boulevard Redwood City, California 94063 Telephone: (650) 474-8200 Facsimile: (650) 474-2529
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to: Sarah A. O'Dowd Stephen B. Thau Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP 275 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 324-7000 Facsimile: (650) 324-0638 Danielle Carbone Shearman & Sterling LLP 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 848-4000 Facsimile: (212) 848-7179

APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective. If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Proposed Maximum Aggregate Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered Offering Prices Amount of Registration Fee (1)

Shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (1) A registration fee of $12,327 was previously paid.

$61,333,330

$7,219

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 4 of 139

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act, or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 5 of 139

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. PROSPECTUS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED FEBRUARY 3, 2005

THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
COMMON STOCK
Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is offering 5,333,333 shares of common stock in a firmly underwritten offering. This is our initial public offering, and no public market currently exists for our shares. We anticipate that the initial public offering price will be between $8.00 and $10.00 per share. After the offering, the market price for our shares may be outside this range. Our common stock has been approved for listing on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol "THLD." Certain of our existing stockholders and their affiliated entities have indicated an interest in purchasing common stock in this offering with an aggregate purchase price of up to $13.7 million at the public offering price. At an initial public offering price of $9.00 per share, the midpoint of the estimated range on the cover of this prospectus, these stockholders would purchase up to approximately 1.5 million shares of our common stock in this offering. Although we expect these stockholders to purchase these shares of common stock, indications of interest are not binding agreements or commitments to purchase.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See " Risk Factors " beginning on page 8.
Per Share Total

Offering price Underwriting discounts and commissions Proceeds to Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., before offering costs

$ $ $

$ $ $

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful and complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. We have granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to 800,000 additional shares of our common stock to cover over-allotments, if any, within 30 days from the date of this prospectus. The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of common stock to our investors on or about , 2005.

Banc of America Securities LLC Lazard
, 2005

CIBC World Markets William Blair & Company

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 6 of 139

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY RISK FACTORS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS USE OF PROCEEDS DIVIDEND POLICY CAPITALIZATION DILUTION SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR NON-UNITED STATES HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK UNDERWRITING LEGAL MATTERS EXPERTS WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1 8 26 27 27 28 29 31 32 42 62 74 76 79 84 87 90 93 93 93 F-1

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized anyone to provide you with different information. We are not making an offer of these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front of this prospectus only. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date. i

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 7 of 139

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus that we believe is most important to understanding how our business is currently being conducted. You should read the entire prospectus before making an investment decision. Overview We are a biotechnology company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of drugs based on Metabolic Targeting TM , an approach that targets fundamental differences in metabolism between normal and certain diseased cells. We are building a pipeline of drugs that are designed to selectively target tumor cells so that the drugs are less toxic to healthy tissues than conventional drugs, thereby providing improvements over current therapies. Our initial clinical focus is the treatment of cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia, or BPH, a disease characterized by overgrowth of the prostate. We have three product candidates. Glufosfamide, our lead product candidate for cancer, has completed Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials in patients with various solid tumors. In September 2004, we initiated a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of glufosfamide for the second-line treatment of pancreatic cancer. We have received a special protocol assessment from the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for this trial. The special protocol assessment is a process that allows for official FDA evaluation of the proposed design of a Phase 3 clinical trial. It provides trial sponsors with an agreement from the FDA on trial design and analysis required to support a new drug application submission, if the study is performed according to the special protocol assessment and meets its primary endpoint. A primary end point is the measurement for determining the effectiveness of a drug candidate in treating the intended illness. In addition, glufosfamide for the treatment of refractory pancreatic cancer has received FDA fast track designation. The fast track drug development program provides for expedited regulatory review for new drugs demonstrating the potential to address unmet medical needs for the treatment of serious life-threatening conditions. TH-070, our lead product candidate for the treatment of symptomatic BPH is being evaluated in a Phase 2 clinical trial. We have completed enrollment in this trial, and we are evaluating interim data. Interim data are preliminary results from a predetermined portion of study participants. We plan to initiate a registrational program for TH-070 to treat symptomatic BPH in the first half of 2005. A registrational program is an overall plan for necessary information gathering and product testing, collectively designed to support ultimate market approval. Our third product candidate, 2-deoxyglucose, or 2DG, for the treatment of solid tumors, is being evaluated in a Phase 1 clinical trial as a combination therapy, which means that it is administered in conjunction with other chemotherapy treatments. We are also working to discover drug candidates that are activated under the metabolic conditions typical of cancer cells, and we have identified lead compounds with promising in vitro data. In addition, we are investigating additional compounds for activity against BPH. Metabolic Targeting Metabolic Targeting is a therapeutic approach that targets fundamental differences in energy metabolism between normal and certain diseased cells. To survive, these diseased cells rely predominantly on glycolysis, also called glucose metabolism, which is the process by which glucose is converted to energy. As a consequence, these cells consume more glucose than do normal cells. In cancer, this increased consumption of glucose has two causes: the process of a normal cell becoming a rapidly dividing cancer cell; and the exposure of a cell to the low oxygen conditions, also called hypoxia, within those regions of most solid tumors where cells are dividing slowly. When these cells shift energy production to glycolysis, they must increase the levels of the proteins 1

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 8 of 139

needed to transport and metabolize glucose. Similarly, cells in BPH rely predominantly on glycolysis for energy production. Metabolic Targeting takes advantage of these metabolic differences to selectively target these diseased cells. For the treatment of cancer, we believe that our product candidates based on Metabolic Targeting can be broadly applied to the treatment of most solid tumors and have the potential to significantly increase the effectiveness of existing therapies. Metabolic Targeting provides the opportunity to treat not only rapidly dividing tumor cells, which are targeted by chemotherapy and radiation, but also slowly dividing tumor cells that generally evade these traditional therapies and ultimately contribute to relapse. For the treatment of BPH, we believe that Metabolic Targeting will enable us to develop a new class of drugs to treat the disease more rapidly and effectively, with fewer side effects than current therapies. We believe that our focus on Metabolic Targeting, combined with our expertise in medicinal chemistry and drug development, provides us with the capability to identify, discover and develop novel therapies. Glufosfamide Glufosfamide, our lead product candidate for cancer, is a small molecule in clinical development for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. We are developing glufosfamide as an intravenous single agent for the second-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer, and in combination with Gemzar ® (gemcitabine) for the first-line treatment of inoperable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Gemzar, a patented drug marketed by Lilly, is currently the standard of care for treatment of pancreatic cancer. First-line treatment means the patient has not been previously treated with chemotherapy. Second-line treatment means the patient has been previously treated with one regimen of chemotherapy. In September 2004, we initiated a pivotal Phase 3 trial of glufosfamide for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have failed treatment with Gemzar. This trial will compare the survival of patients treated with glufosfamide to patients who receive only best supportive care. The FDA has completed a special protocol assessment for this trial and concluded that the trial design and analysis would support a new drug application submission if the study is performed according to the special protocol assessment and the trial meets its primary endpoint by demonstrating a statistically significant effect on patient survival. In addition, glufosfamide for the treatment of refractory pancreatic cancer has been granted fast track designation by the FDA. The fast track drug development program provides for expedited regulatory review for new drugs demonstrating the potential to address unmet medical needs for the treatment of serious or life-threatening conditions. As part of our registration and approval strategy, in December 2004, we initiated a Phase 1/2 trial to evaluate various doses of glufosfamide in combination with Gemzar for the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer patients. We are developing glufosfamide for pancreatic cancer based on activity seen in previous clinical trials, a known increase in glucose uptake in pancreatic cancer cells and the extreme hypoxia in tumors of this type. Glufosfamide has been evaluated in two Phase 1 and five Phase 2 clinical trials that together enrolled over 200 patients with a variety of advanced-stage cancers. In the Phase 2 trials, glufosfamide showed activity against breast, colon, non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancers, but not a type of brain cancer called glioblastoma. In a 34-patient Phase 2 trial of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, overall median survival with glufosfamide was estimated at 5.6 months, and two-year survival was estimated at 9%. In the Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials, glufosfamide was generally well tolerated, with few drug-related serious adverse events. The safety and efficacy of glufosfamide to treat pancreatic cancer will need to be demonstrated in our pivotal Phase 3 program before we can receive marketing approval from the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies. 2

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 9 of 139

TH-070 TH-070, our lead product candidate for the treatment of symptomatic BPH, is being evaluated in a Phase 2 trial in Italy. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the safety and tolerability of TH-070 in patients with BPH. In addition, patients are being evaluated for efficacy as measured by changes in specific variables that have been used in clinical trials of currently marketed BPH drugs to support their FDA approval. The primary endpoint specified in the protocol for our trial is a comparison of prostate size between baseline and day 28 of treatment. We have completed enrollment and are evaluating interim data. We observed statistically significant improvements in all variables measured by day 28. In the study, TH-070 was well tolerated with no therapy-related side effects. The safety and efficacy of TH-070 for the treatment of symptomatic BPH will need to be demonstrated in subsequent trials. Based on these interim Phase 2 results, we are designing a registrational program for TH-070 to treat symptomatic BPH. Our registrational program will include multiple multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies, including at least one dose-comparison study. We expect to commence two clinical trials in the first half of 2005, one of which we believe will be a Phase 3 trial. There can be no assurance that regulatory agencies will consider this Phase 3 trial pivotal. Our registrational program will include additional trials. TH-070 is an orally administered small molecule that has been reported to inhibit the enzyme that catalyzes the first step in glycolysis. We initially selected TH-070 to treat BPH based on our understanding that prostate cells rely predominantly on glycolysis for energy production as well as published animal data and human clinical data demonstrating tolerability. TH-070 offers the potential to treat symptomatic BPH via a novel mechanism, by reducing the prostate size through Metabolic Targeting. By directly inhibiting glycolysis in prostate cells, we expect TH-070 to reduce the size of the prostate more rapidly than current medical treatments, without the attendant side effects, which include decreased libido, impotence and cardiovascular effects. 2-Deoxyglucose (2DG) 2DG, our product candidate for the treatment of solid tumors, is in a Phase 1 trial. 2DG is an orally administered small molecule that employs Metabolic Targeting to treat solid tumors by directly inhibiting glycolysis, the major source of energy production in these tissues. Because tumor cells in general, and those in hypoxic zones in particular, are dependent on glycolysis for survival, tumor cells are particularly sensitive to the effect of 2DG. We are conducting a Phase 1 trial of daily 2DG as a single agent and in combination with Taxotere ® (docetaxel) to evaluate the safety, blood levels and maximum tolerated dose of 2DG in patients with solid tumors. Taxotere, a patented drug marketed by the sanofi-aventis Group, is used to treat different types of cancer, including lung and breast cancers. We plan to conduct a Phase 1 trial of a single dose of 2DG to evaluate its effect on prostate metabolism. We are developing 2DG based on its specificity for targeting tumor cells and extensive human safety data, as well as recently demonstrated animal efficacy that we and our collaborators published in Cancer Research in January 2004. Our Strategy Our goal is to create a leading biotechnology company that develops and commercializes drugs based on Metabolic Targeting, with an initial focus on cancer and BPH. Key elements of our strategy are to: · · · · Develop glufosfamide, TH-070 and 2DG successfully; Continue to broaden our pipeline by identifying, discovering and developing new compounds; Build on our expertise in Metabolic Targeting through continued research in cellular metabolism; and Develop sales and marketing capabilities in select markets. 3

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 10 of 139

In executing our business strategy, we face significant risks and uncertainties, which are highlighted in the section entitled "Risk Factors." We are a development stage company and have a limited operating history. We have experienced operating losses since our inception, and we expect to incur significantly greater operating losses for the next several years as we advance our clinical development programs. None of our product candidates has been approved for sale by the FDA, and we have not generated any revenue since our inception. If we are unable to develop, receive regulatory approval for and successfully commercialize any of our product candidates, we will be unable to generate significant revenues, and we may never become profitable. Our Corporate Information We were incorporated in Delaware on October 17, 2001. Our principal executive offices are located at 1300 Seaport Boulevard, Redwood City, California, 94063. Our telephone number is (650) 474-8200. Our website is located at www.thresholdpharm.com . Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not part of this prospectus. Unless the context requires otherwise, in this prospectus the terms "Threshold Pharmaceuticals," "we," "us" and "our" refer to Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., our logo and Metabolic Targeting are our trademarks. Other trademarks, trade names and service marks used in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners. 4

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 11 of 139

THE OFFERING Common stock offered Common stock to be outstanding after the offering Use of proceeds 5,333,333 shares 29,254,907 shares We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for clinical development of our glufosfamide, TH-070 and 2DG product candidates, research and development activities, initial development of sales and marketing infrastructure and working capital and other general corporate purposes. See "Use of Proceeds" for additional information. See "Risk Factors" and the other information in this prospectus for important information that you should consider before deciding whether to invest in shares of our common stock. THLD

Risk Factors Proposed NASDAQ National Market symbol

The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after the closing of this offering is based on 3,368,759 shares of our common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2004 and has been adjusted to reflect, and unless otherwise indicated, the conversion of all of our outstanding preferred stock into 20,552,815 shares of our common stock, which will occur automatically upon the closing of this offering. The number of shares of our common stock outstanding after the offering excludes: · 265,338 shares of our common stock that were subject to a call feature as of September 30, 2004, which call feature has since been cancelled; · 256,979 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2004 at a weighted average exercise price of $0.39 per share; · · · · 23,073 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant outstanding as of September 30, 2004 with an exercise price of $1.65 per share, which does not expire upon the closing of this offering; 533,903 shares of common stock available for future grants under our 2001 Equity Incentive Plan as of September 30, 2004; 2,428,805 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan; and 750,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus (i) assumes that the underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase up to 800,000 shares of our common stock to cover over-allotments, if any, (ii) assumes 20,552,815 shares of our common stock resulting from the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock into common stock upon completion of this offering and (iii) gives effect to a 1 for 1.6469 reverse stock split of our common stock effected on January 26, 2005. Certain of our existing stockholders and their affiliated entities have indicated an interest in purchasing common stock in this offering with an aggregate purchase price of up to $13.7 million at the public offering price. At an initial public offering price of $9.00 per share, the midpoint of the estimated range on the cover of this prospectus, these stockholders would purchase up to approximately 1.5 million shares of our common stock in this offering. Although we expect these stockholders to purchase these shares of common stock, indications of interest are not binding agreements or commitments to purchase. 5

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 12 of 139

SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA The summary financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this prospectus. See Note 2 to our financial statements for information regarding computation of net loss per share attributable to common stockholders and Note 13 to our financial statements for information regarding computation of pro forma net loss per share attributable to common stockholders.
Period from October 17, 2001 (date of inception) to December 31, 2001 Years Ended December 31, Nine Months Ended September 30, Cumulative Period from October 17, 2001 (date of inception) to September 30, 2004

2002

2003

2003

2004

(In thousands, except per share data)

Operating expenses: Research and development General and administrative Total operating expenses Loss from operations Interest income Interest expense Net loss Dividend related to beneficial conversion feature of convertible preferred stock Net loss attributable to common stockholders Net loss per common share: Basic and diluted Weighted average number of shares used in per common share calculations: Basic and diluted Pro forma net loss per common share (unaudited): Basic and diluted (1) Weighted average number of shares used in pro forma per common share calculations (unaudited): Basic and diluted

$

35 201 236 (236) -- -- (236) --

$ 2,179 306 2,485 (2,485) 27 -- (2,458) -- $(2,458)

$ 6,252 2,057 8,309 (8,309) 65 (59) (8,303) (40,862) $(49,165)

$ 4,868 1,591 6,459 (6,459) 17 (24) (6,466) -- $(6,466)

$ 10,852 5,137 15,989 (15,989) 313 (27) (15,703) -- $(15,703)

$

19,318 7,701 27,019 (27,019) 405 (86) (26,700) (40,862)

$

(236)

$

(67,562)

$

(2.13)

$(34.62)

$(501.68)

$(67.35)

$ (26.57)

111

71

98

96

591

$

(6.66)

$

(0.74)

7,381

21,144

(1)

Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per common share have been computed to give effect to the automatic conversion of all of our outstanding preferred stock into 20,552,815 shares of common stock upon the closing of this offering (using the as-converted method) for the year ended December 31, 2003 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. 6

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 13 of 139

The following table presents a summary of our balance sheet as of September 30, 2004: · · · on an actual basis; on a pro forma basis to give effect to the automatic conversion of all of our outstanding preferred stock into 20,552,815 shares of our common stock upon the completion of this offering; and on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give further effect to the sale of shares of common stock by us in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $9.00 per share (the midpoint of the estimated price range shown on the cover page of this prospectus), after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering costs to be paid by us.
As of September 30, 2004 Pro Forma Actual (In thousands) Pro Forma As Adjusted

Balance Sheet Data: Cash and cash equivalents Working capital Total assets Notes payable, less current portion Redeemable convertible preferred stock Total stockholders' equity (deficit) 7

$ 16,237 28,587 31,375 185 49,839 (20,940)

$ 16,237 28,587 31,375 185 -- 28,899

$ 58,992 71,342 74,130 185 -- 71,654

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 14 of 139

RISK FACTORS Any investment in our stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below and all information contained in this prospectus, before you decide whether to purchase our common stock. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks or uncertainties, and you may lose part or all of your investment. RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS Risks Related to Drug Discovery, Development and Commercialization We are substantially dependent upon the success of our glufosfamide and TH-070 product candidates. Pivotal clinical trials for our products may not demonstrate efficacy or lead to regulatory approval. We will not be able to commercialize our lead product candidates, glufosfamide and TH-070, until we obtain FDA approval in the United States or approval by comparable regulatory agencies in Europe and other countries. To satisfy FDA or foreign regulatory approval standards for the commercial sale of our product candidates, we must demonstrate in adequate and controlled clinical trials that our product candidates are safe and effective. Success in preclinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry, including biotechnology companies, have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after obtaining promising results in earlier clinical trials. For example, estimates of survival time or percentages obtained from small scale Phase 2 clinical trials are not necessarily indicative of the results in larger clinical trials. Phase 1 and Phase 2 safety trials of glufosfamide were conducted on small numbers of patients and were designed to evaluate the activity of glufosfamide on a preliminary basis. However, these trials were not designed to demonstrate the efficacy of glufosfamide as a therapeutic agent. Although we believe the Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials of glufosfamide have generated promising early data, there can be no assurance that similar results will be observed in subsequent trials, or that such results will prove to be statistically significant or demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA or other regulatory agencies. In Phase 2 studies, glufosfamide has not shown clinical activity for the treatment of glioblastoma and has only demonstrated marginal activity for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. We believe that the clinical trial we commenced in September 2004 for the second-line treatment of pancreatic cancer will serve as a pivotal Phase 3 trial. If the results from this trial are not persuasive as determined by the FDA, then this trial will not serve as the basis for FDA approval. Even though we have a special protocol assessment for this trial, we may decide to conduct additional clinical trials or other studies, or the FDA may require us to conduct additional clinical trials or other studies prior to accepting our NDA or granting marketing approval. While we believe that interim results of our Phase 2 trial for TH-070 suggest it may effectively treat symptomatic BPH, there can be no assurance that our registrational program will confirm our interim results, will show that beneficial results of TH-070 will be sustained beyond 28 days, or will lead to regulatory approval. Moreover, regulatory agencies may require additional preclinical and clinical studies to support approval of TH-070 for the treatment of symptomatic BPH. The clinical trials we plan to commence in 2005 for TH-070 may not be pivotal trials, and our registrational program will include additional trials. Our product candidates must undergo rigorous clinical testing, the results of which are uncertain and could substantially delay or prevent us from bringing them to market. Before we can obtain regulatory approval for a product candidate, we must undertake extensive clinical testing in humans to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA or other regulatory agencies. Clinical trials of new drug candidates sufficient to obtain regulatory marketing approval are expensive and take years to complete. 8

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 15 of 139

We cannot assure you that we will successfully complete clinical testing within the time frame we have planned, or at all. We may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, the clinical trial process that could delay or prevent us from receiving regulatory approval or commercializing our product candidates, including the following: · our clinical trials may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical and/or preclinical testing or to abandon programs; · · · · · the results obtained in earlier stage testing may not be indicative of results in future trials; trial results may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or other regulatory agencies; enrollment in our clinical trials for our product candidates may be slower than we anticipate, resulting in significant delays; we, or regulators, may suspend or terminate our clinical trials if the participating patients are being exposed to unacceptable health risks; and the effects of our product candidates on patients may not be the desired effects or may include undesirable side effects or other characteristics that may delay or preclude regulatory approval or limit their commercial use, if approved.

Completion of clinical trials depends, among other things, on our ability to enroll a sufficient number of patients, which is a function of many factors, including: · · · · · · the therapeutic endpoints chosen for evaluation; the eligibility criteria defined in the protocol; the size of the patient population required for analysis of the trial's therapeutic endpoints; our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience; our ability to obtain and maintain patient consents; and competition for patients by clinical trial programs for other treatments.

We may experience difficulties in enrolling patients in our clinical trials, which could increase the costs or affect the timing or outcome of these trials. This is particularly true with respect to diseases with relatively small patient populations, such as pancreatic cancer, which is an indication for our glufosfamide product candidate. We are subject to significant regulatory approval requirements, which could delay, prevent or limit our ability to market our product candidates. Our research and development activities, preclinical studies, clinical trials and the anticipated manufacturing and marketing of our product candidates are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the United States and by comparable authorities in Europe and elsewhere. We require the approval of the relevant regulatory authorities before we may commence commercial sales of our product candidates in a given market. The regulatory approval process is expensive and time-consuming, and the timing of receipt of regulatory approval is difficult to predict. Our product candidates could require a significantly longer time to gain regulatory approval than expected, or may never gain approval. We cannot assure you that, even after expending substantial time and financial resources, we will obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. A delay or denial of regulatory approval could delay or prevent our ability to generate product revenues and to achieve profitability. Changes in the regulatory approval policy during the development period of any of our product candidates, changes in, or the enactment of, additional regulations or statutes, or changes in regulatory review practices for a submitted product application may cause a delay in obtaining approval or result in the rejection of an application for regulatory approval. 9

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 16 of 139

Regulatory approval, if obtained, may be made subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which we may market a product. These limitations could adversely affect our potential product revenues. Regulatory approval may also require costly post-marketing follow-up studies. In addition, the labeling, packaging, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and record-keeping related to the product will be subject to extensive ongoing regulatory requirements. Furthermore, for any marketed product, its manufacturer and its manufacturing facilities will be subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements may, among other things, result in fines, suspensions of regulatory approvals, product recalls, product seizures, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution. The "fast track" designation for development of glufosfamide for the treatment of refractory pancreatic cancer may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process. If a drug is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition and the drug demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for this condition, the drug sponsor may apply for FDA "fast track" designation for a particular indication. Marketing applications filed by sponsors of products in fast track development may qualify for expedited FDA review under the policies and procedures offered by the FDA, but the fast track designation does not assure any such qualification. Although we have obtained a fast track designation from the FDA for glufosfamide for the treatment of refractory pancreatic cancer, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to drugs considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures. In addition, the FDA may withdraw our fast track designation at any time. If we lose our fast track designation, the approval process may be delayed. In addition, our fast track designation does not guarantee that we will qualify for or be able to take advantage of the expedited review procedures and does not increase the likelihood that glufosfamide will receive regulatory approval for the treatment of refractory pancreatic cancer. Our product candidates are based on Metabolic Targeting, which is an unproven approach to therapeutic intervention. All of our product candidates are based on Metabolic Targeting, a therapeutic approach that targets fundamental differences in energy metabolism between normal and certain diseased cells. We have not, nor to our knowledge has any other company, received regulatory approval for a drug based on this approach. There can be no assurance that our approach will lead to the development of approvable or marketable drugs. In addition, the FDA or other regulatory agencies may lack experience in evaluating the safety and efficacy of drugs based on Metabolic Targeting, which could lengthen the regulatory review process, increase our development costs and delay or prevent commercialization of our product candidates. Our product candidates may have undesirable side effects that prevent their regulatory approval or limit their use if approved. Glufosfamide is known to cause reversible toxicity to the bone marrow and kidneys, as well as nausea and vomiting. TH-070, which we are developing to treat patients with BPH, has been investigated as a male contraceptive and is known to cause reversible effects on fertility in animals. In human clinical trials at doses significantly higher than the dose of TH-070 we contemplate investigating for BPH, muscle and testicular pain have been observed. These side effects or others that could be identified in the course of our clinical trials or that may otherwise be associated with our product candidates may outweigh the benefits of our product candidates and prevent regulatory approval or limit their market acceptance if they are approved. Delays in clinical testing could result in increased costs to us and delay our ability to obtain regulatory approval and commercialize our product candidates. Significant delays in clinical testing could materially impact our product development costs and delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We do not know whether planned clinical trials will begin on 10

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 17 of 139

time, will need to be redesigned or will be completed on schedule, if at all. Clinical trials can be delayed for a variety of reasons, including delays in: · · · · · obtaining regulatory approval to commence a trial; obtaining clinical materials; reaching agreement on acceptable clinical study agreement terms with prospective sites; obtaining institutional review board approval to conduct a study at a prospective site; and recruiting patients to participate in a study.

Orphan drug exclusivity affords us limited protection, and if another party obtains orphan drug exclusivity for the drugs and indications we are targeting, we may be precluded from commercializing our product candidates in those indications. We intend to seek orphan drug designation for the cancer indications that our glufosfamide and 2DG product candidates are intended to treat. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is defined by the FDA as a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States. The company that obtains the first FDA approval for a designated orphan drug indication receives marketing exclusivity for use of that drug for that indication for a period of seven years. Orphan drug exclusive marketing rights may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective, or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantity of the drug. Orphan drug designation does not shorten the development or regulatory review time of a drug, but does provide limited advantages in the regulatory review and approval process. Because the prevalence of BPH is greater than 200,000 individuals in the United States, TH-070 for the treatment of symptomatic BPH is not eligible for orphan drug designation and we cannot rely on this protection to provide marketing exclusivity. Orphan drug exclusivity may not prevent other market entrants. A different drug, or, under limited circumstances, the same drug may be approved by the FDA for the same orphan indication. The limited circumstances are an inability to supply the drug in sufficient quantities or where a new formulation of the drug has shown superior safety or efficacy. As a result, if our product is approved and receives orphan drug status, the FDA can still approve other drugs for use in treating the same indication covered by our product, which could create a more competitive market for us. Moreover, due to the uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products, we may not be the first to obtain marketing approval for any orphan drug indication. Even if we obtain orphan drug designation, if a competitor obtains regulatory approval for glufosfamide or 2DG for the same indication we are targeting before us, we would be blocked from obtaining approval for that indication for seven years, unless our product is a new formulation of the drug that has shown superior safety or efficacy, or the competitor is unable to supply sufficient quantities. Even if we obtain regulatory approval, our marketed drugs will be subject to ongoing regulatory review. If we fail to comply with continuing United States and foreign regulations, we could lose our approvals to market drugs and our business would be seriously harmed. Following initial regulatory approval of any drugs we may develop, we will be subject to continuing regulatory review, including review of adverse drug experiences and clinical results that are reported after our drug products become commercially available. This would include results from any post-marketing tests or vigilance required as a condition of approval. The manufacturer and manufacturing facilities we use to make any of our drug candidates will also be subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA. If a previously unknown problem or problems with a product or a manufacturing and laboratory facility used by us is discovered, the FDA or foreign regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product or on the manufacturing facility, including requiring us to withdraw the product from the market. Any changes to an 11

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 18 of 139

approved product, including the way it is manufactured or promoted, often require FDA approval before the product, as modified, can be marketed. We and our contract manufacturers will be subject to ongoing FDA requirements for submission of safety and other post-market information. If we and our contract manufacturers fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency may: · issue warning letters; · · · · · · · impose civil or criminal penalties; suspend or withdraw our regulatory approval; suspend any of our ongoing clinical trials; refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications filed by us; impose restrictions on our operations; close the facilities of our contract manufacturers; or seize or detain products or require a product recall.

Risks Related to Our Financial Performance and Operations We have incurred losses since our inception and anticipate that we will incur significant continued losses for the next several years, and our future profitability is uncertain. We are a development stage company with a limited operating history and no current source of revenue from our product candidates. We have incurred losses in each year since our inception in 2001. We have devoted substantially all of our resources to research and development of our product candidates. We have financed our operations primarily through private placements of our equity securities. For the year ended December 31, 2003, we had a net loss of $8.3 million and for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we had a net loss of $15.7 million. As of September 30, 2004, we had an accumulated deficit of $26.7 million. We do not expect to generate any revenue from our product candidates over the next several years. Clinical trials are costly, and as we continue to advance our product candidates through development, we expect our research and development expenses to increase significantly, especially as we continue our pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial for glufosfamide and begin our registrational program for TH-070 for the treatment of BPH. In addition, we plan to significantly expand our operations, and will need to expand our infrastructure and facilities and hire additional personnel. As a result, we expect that our annual operating losses will increase significantly over the next several years. To attain profitability, we will need to successfully develop products and effectively market and sell them. We have never generated revenue from our product candidates, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to do so in the future. If our glufosfamide or TH-070 product candidates fail to show positive results in our ongoing clinical trials, and we do not receive regulatory approval for one or more of them, or if these product candidates do not achieve market acceptance even if approved, we will not become profitable for at least the next several years. If we fail to become profitable, or if we are unable to fund our continuing losses, we may be unable to continue our clinical development programs, and you could lose your entire investment. We may need substantial additional funding and may be unable to raise capital when needed, which could force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our drug discovery, product development and commercialization activities. Developing drugs, conducting clinical trials, and commercializing products is expensive. Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including: · the progress and cost of our clinical trials and other research and development activities; · the costs and timing of obtaining regulatory approval; 12

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents · · · ·

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 19 of 139

the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent applications, claims, patents and other intellectual property rights; the cost and timing of securing manufacturing capabilities for our clinical product candidates and commercial products, if any; the costs of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities; and the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing and other arrangements that we may establish.

We believe that the net proceeds from this offering, together with our cash on hand, will be sufficient to fund our projected operating requirements for at least the next two years, including clinical trials of glufosfamide, TH-070 and 2DG, the initial development of a sales and marketing effort, general corporate purposes and for the research and development of additional product candidates. However, we may need to raise additional capital or incur indebtedness to continue to fund our operations in the future. Our ability to raise additional funds will depend on financial, economic and market conditions and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that sufficient funds will be available to us when required or on satisfactory terms. If necessary funds are not available, we may have to delay, reduce the scope or eliminate some of our development programs, which could delay the time to market for any of our product candidates. We may also need to seek funds through arrangements with collaborators or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain product candidates that we might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize independently. Raising additional funds may cause dilution to existing stockholders or require us to relinquish valuable rights. We may raise additional funds through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. To the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience further dilution. Debt financing, if available, may subject us to restrictive covenants that could limit our flexibility in conducting future business activities. To the extent that we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, it will be necessary to relinquish some rights to our clinical product candidates. If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities, we may be unable to successfully commercialize our cancer and BPH product candidates. If our cancer product candidates are approved for commercial sale, we plan to establish our own sales force to market them in the United States and potentially Europe. We may also consider establishing a sales force to market TH-070 for the treatment of symptomatic BPH. We currently have no experience in selling, marketing or distributing pharmaceutical products and do not have a sales force to do so. Before we can commercialize any products, we must develop our sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, which is an expensive and time consuming process, and our failure to do this successfully could delay any product launch. Our efforts to develop internal sales and marketing capabilities could face a number of risks, including: · · · we may not be able to attract a sufficient number of qualified sales and marketing personnel; the cost of establishing a marketing or sales force may not be justifiable in light of the potential revenues for any particular product; and our internal sales and marketing efforts may not be effective.

Our success depends in part on recruiting and retaining key personnel and, if we fail to do so, it may be more difficult for us to execute our business strategy. We are currently a small organization and will need to hire additional personnel to execute our business strategy successfully. Our success depends on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management, clinical and scientific personnel and on our ability to develop and maintain important relationships with leading 13

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 20 of 139

academic institutions, clinicians and scientists. We are highly dependent upon our senior management and scientific staff, particularly our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Harold E. Selick, and our founder and President, Dr. George F. Tidmarsh. We do not have employment contracts with either Dr. Selick or Dr. Tidmarsh. We are named as the beneficiary on term life insurance policies covering Dr. Selick and Dr. Tidmarsh in the amount of $2 million each. The loss of the services of Dr. Selick, Dr. Tidmarsh or one or more of our other key employees could delay or prevent the successful completion of our clinical trials or the commercialization of our product candidates. As of November 30, 2004, we had 42 employees. Over the next three to six months, we expect to add a significant number of new employees at an annual cost between $2 and $4 million. Our success will depend on our ability to hire additional qualified personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the biotechnology field is intense. We face competition for personnel from other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, universities, public and private research institutions and other organizations. We may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel on acceptable terms given the competition for such personnel. If we are unsuccessful in our recruitment efforts, we may be unable to execute our strategy. As we expand our operations, we may experience difficulties in managing our growth. Future growth will impose significant added responsibilities on management, including the need to identify, recruit, train and integrate additional employees. In addition, rapid and significant growth will place a strain on our administrative and operational infrastructure. As our operations expand, we expect that we will need to manage additional relationships with collaborators and various third parties, including contract research organizations, manufacturers and others. Our ability to manage our operations and growth will require us to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, it may be difficult for us to execute our business strategy. Because we have operated as a private company, we have no experience complying with public company obligations, including recently enacted changes in securities laws and regulations. Compliance with these requirements will increase our costs and require additional management resources, and we still may fail to comply. We are a small company with limited resources. We have operated as a private company, not subject to many of the requirements applicable to public companies. While we plan to expand our staff if we become public, we may encounter substantial difficulty attracting qualified staff with requisite experience due to the high level of competition for experienced financial professionals. As directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on the company's internal controls over financial reporting in their annual reports on Form 10-K. In addition, the independent registered public accounting firm auditing the company's financial statements must attest to and report on management's assessment of the effectiveness of the company's internal controls over financial reporting. This requirement will first apply to our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. Substantial uncertainty exists regarding our ability to comply with these requirements by applicable deadlines. If we are unable to complete the required assessment as to the adequacy of our internal control reporting or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified report as to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and future year ends, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial reporting. Our facilities in California are located near an earthquake fault, and an earthquake or other natural disaster or resource shortage could disrupt our operations. Important documents and records, such as hard copies of our laboratory books and records for our product candidates, are located in our corporate headquarters at a single location in Redwood City, California, near active 14

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 21 of 139

earthquake zones. In the event of a natural disaster, such as an earthquake, drought or flood, or localized extended outages of critical utilities or transportation systems, we do not have a formal business continuity or disaster recovery plan, and could therefore experience a significant business interruption. In addition, California from time to time has experienced shortages of water, electric power and natural gas. Future shortages and conservation measures could disrupt our operations and could result in additional expense. Although we maintain business interruption insurance coverage, the policy specifically excludes coverage for earthquake and flood. Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties We rely on third parties to manufacture glufosfamide, TH-070 and 2DG. If these parties do not manufacture the active pharmaceutical ingredients or finished products of satisfactory quality, in a timely manner, in sufficient quantities or at an acceptable cost, clinical development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed. We do not currently own or operate manufacturing facilities; consequently, we rely and expect to continue to rely on third parties for the production of clinical and commercial quantities of our product candidates. We have not yet entered into any long term manufacturing or supply agreement for any of our product candidates. Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product candidates may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize any product candidates on a timely and competitive basis. Our current supplies of glufosfamide have been prepared by a subsidiary of Baxter International, Inc. and we are depending on those materials in order to conduct and complete our planned clinical trials. Should those materials not remain stable, we may experience a significant delay in the completion of our pivotal Phase 3 trial. Although we are in the process of qualifying back-up vendors to manufacture glufosfamide active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API, and drug product, we have not yet done so, and we may not be able to do so at an acceptable cost or terms, if at all. We believe that we have sufficient supplies of TH-070 API to conduct and complete our currently planned BPH clinical trials. We have ordered additional TH-070 API from Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Company, Ltd. We have recently entered into an agreement with Pharmaceutics International, Incorporated for the manufacture of TH-070 drug product. We have not yet received any API or drug product from these manufacturers. The failure of Pharmaceutics International to meet quality requirements or otherwise perform its obligations could significantly delay our TH-070 clinical program. In addition, failure of Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Company to provide acceptable API could delay commercialization of TH-070, if approved. We believe that we have a sufficient supply of 2DG for our anticipated clinical trials over the next two years, although there can be no assurance that these supplies will remain stable and usable during this period. If these materials are not stable, we may experience a significant delay in our 2DG clinical program. We will need to enter into additional agreements for additional supplies of each of our product candidates to complete clinical development and/or commercialize them. There can be no assurance that we can do so on favorable terms, if at all. For regulatory purposes, we will have to demonstrate comparability of the same drug substance from different manufacturers. Our inability to do so could delay our clinical programs. To date, our product candidates have been manufactured in quantities sufficient for preclinical studies or initial clinical trials. If any of our product candidates is approved by the FDA or other regulatory agencies for commercial sale, we will need to have it manufactured in commercial quantities. We may not be able to successfully increase the manufacturing capacity for any of our product candidates in a timely or economic manner or at all. Significant scale-up of manufacturing may require additional validation studies, which the FDA and other regulatory agencies must review and approve. If we are unable to successfully increase the manufacturing capacity for a product candidate, the regulatory approval or commercial launch of that product candidate may be delayed, or there may be a shortage of supply which could limit our sales. 15

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW
Table of Contents

Document 20-2

Filed 03/07/2008

Page 22 of 139

In addition, if the facility or the equipment in the facility that produces our product candidates is significantly damaged or destroyed, or if the facility is located in another country and trade or commerce with such country is interrupted, we may be unable to replace the manufacturing capacity quickly or inexpensively. The inability to obtain manufacturing agreements, the damage or destruction of a facility on which we rely for manufacturing or any other delays in obtaining supply would delay or prevent us from completing our clinical trials and commercializing our current product candidates. We have no control over our manufacturers' and suppliers' compliance with manufacturing regulations, and their failure to comply could result in an interruption in the supply of our product candidates. The facilities used by our contract manufacturers must undergo an inspection by the FDA for compliance with current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP regulations, before the respective product candidates can be approved. In the event these facilities do not receive a satisfactory cGMP inspection for the manufacture of our product candidates, we may need to fund additional modifications to our manufacturing process, conduct additional validation studies, or find alternative manufacturing facilities, any of which would result in significant cost to us as well as a delay of up to several years in obtaining approval for such product candidate. In addition, our contract manufacturers, and any alternative contract manufacturer we may utilize, will be subject to ongoing periodic inspection by the FDA and corresponding state and foreign agencies for compliance with cGMP regulations and similar foreign standards. We do not have control over our contract manufacturers' compliance with these regulations and standards. Any failure by our third-party manufacturers or suppliers to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on them (including fines, injunctions and civil penalties), failure of regulatory authorities to grant marketing approval of our product candidates, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of product candidates or products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution. We rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials, and their failure to perform their obligations in a timely or competent manner may delay development and commercialization of our product candidates. We rely almost exclusively on third-party clinical investigators to conduct our clinical trials and other third-party organizations to oversee the operations of such clinical trials and to perform data collection and analysis. We are currently using several third-party clinical investigators. We are also using clinical research organizations to oversee our ongoing glufosfamide and TH-070 clinical trials and expect to use the same or similar organizations for our anticipated clinical trials