Free Order Referring Case to Mediation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 41.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: January 17, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 343 Words, 2,474 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196232/16.pdf

Download Order Referring Case to Mediation - District Court of California ( 41.5 kB)


Preview Order Referring Case to Mediation - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04956-SI

Document 16 12

01/17/2008 Filed 01/14/2008

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GERALD LEE and STEVEN TAYLOR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-04956-SI

Plaintiff(s), STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.
CONAM INSPECTION AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.

Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Mediation with private mediator 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
Mark Rudy of Rudy Exelrod & Zieff.

_____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9
May 30, 2008 other requested deadline _____________________________________________

1/10/2008 Dated:___________

Steven M. Tindall ____________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff Marcus Torrano ____________________________ Attorney for Defendant

1/10/2008 Dated:____________

Case 3:07-cv-04956-SI

Document 16 12

01/17/2008 Filed 01/14/2008

Page 2 of 2

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. May 30, 2008 9 other ___________________ IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:________________

___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE