Free ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options - District Court of California - California


File Size: 132.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 672 Words, 4,006 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196259/12.pdf

Download ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options - District Court of California ( 132.7 kB)


Preview ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04902-VRW

Document 12

Filed 12/05/2007

Page 1 of 3

DISTRICTCOURT TINITED STATES OF DISTRICT CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
':III, GI'ND, GEORGE ETC., ET 4L.,.

MEJ Case No. C 07-04902 Plaintiff(s),-. ADR CERTIFICATIONBY PARTIES AND COLINSEL v,
PILATUS AIRCMTT,

trTD., EI AL., Defendant(s).

certifies pursuant Civil L.R. 16-S(b) ADR L.R. 3-5 @),eachof the undersigned and to that he or shehas: in Procedares theNorthernDistrict Resolution entitled"Dispute (l) Readthe handbook printed (Limited of Califomi4" on the Cqurt'sADR Intemetsitewww.adr.cand.uscourts.qov not ore iopies- availablefromthe clerk'sofficeforpartiesin cases subiectto the eourt's Order 45); Efecnonic CaseFiling prograrn (ECF) underGeneral opiionsprovidedby the Court andprivate resolution diqpute (2) Discussed available the entities;and dispute mightbenefitfrom anyof the available whetherthis case (3) Considered options. resolution

pu1"4; necernbeT 5,

2007

( Dated:DecenbeJ!,zoot
L. CROOKE LIPSCOMB& LACK FOR PLAINTII'FS

Rev. 12/05

Case 3:07-cv-04902-VRW

Document 12

Filed 12/05/2007

Page 2 of 3

tl il
t ll
ll couNTYoF

PRooF sERVICE *RooF oF 'ER'ICE oF
)

z srarE cALIFoRNIA oF ll I ,, : Los ANGELES
6ll tl

|

|

I I
| I
I I I

. ll State California. amovertheI I in of I amemoloved theCountv LosAneeles. of mv is address 10100 Santa ll aseof 18 and'noia partvto the ivithinactioil; business I s Monica 90067. lithrFloor, Angeles, Los California Boulevard, ll I

I as: on December , z}}l,described

? ADR .ERTIFICATI'N BY PARTIES AND .'LTNSEL ll

I I
|
I I I I I I I

in envelope addressed ro'o*r' uu | as enclosed a sealed sed follows:b' ll bv olacinsa truecopvthereof 0ll plabing in envelope addressed follorvs: as copyth"ereof enclosed a sealed aTrue tl I **SEE, IOII ATTACHEDMAILING LIST** I 11ll " (BY in Los Aneeles suchenvelope the mail at t-o, ann.t.r. I ll ,BY MAIL) I deoosited 12ll Califoini-a. bnvelope mailed theieon I fullv prepaid. am"rdadily was with postase Ihe I for of and processfn^g cbnespondence I familiar"with the firm's practice collbctiori - ^ ll ^same lr ll mailins.It is deposited U.S.Postal on datelntheordinary course with Service that I is invalidif I that service presumed I of business. am aware on motionof partyseryed, . . ll

8ll

meter ismore otre arter ordenosit date than dav date ry':lglinru:ii',iiF'tiil1"-l-":'T: il ll |. I t'
ll to of , ^ ll Uyhan-d theoffices theaddle$p-gQ)-^ lo (BY
I I I I I I I I I

| | | | |

ELECTRONIC TRANSFER) [ caused of the pases the I all of ll n'oted transferI to abovevia electronic documents be sentto the recipients . - ll above--entitled ' ' ll (FAX) at therespective indicated numbers aboveat . Thisdocument telephone I reported without error. 1" ll was transmittedbyfacsimileand transmission I 'o ll (BY FEDERALEXPRESS)I caused suchenvelope be deliveredl to for to Express overniehtcourierservic'e the officesof the addressee(s). I ,^ ll to Federal '' STATE: I declaieunderpenaltyof perjuryunderthe lawsof theStateof I ll ll Californiathat the aboveis true and correct. I "" ll " X FEDERAL: I declarethat I am employedin the office of a memberof the I t

|
t | |

direction service made. the was at ^ ll barof thiscourt whose

l I I declare underpenalty periurv underthe lawsof the,State California the I of of that ll '"' ll lorqgoing is true and correct.Execuledon December 5 , 2001 at Los Angeles,I

I
I I

|
|

,oX
t

l t

r'll

, \iit f <_ (/ti./\.t(_--_

|
| t

,ll
t

26 ll

l

t t
t

i

, t l ll

l

l

t

t

l

i

l

I

l

Case 3:07-cv-04902-VRW

Document 12

Filed 12/05/2007

Page 3 of 3

Gund, et al. v. Pilatas Aircruft, Ltd., et. ul, DistrictCASENO. C 07 4902(MEJ) USDC- Northern Court,County SanFrancisco of fSuperior 1331 No. Case CGC-07-465 GarthW. Aubeft,Esq. Esq. Martorell, Eduardo MENDES& MOUNT Street, Flr. 38'n 445S.Figueroa Los Ange"les, 900i1-1601 CA (213)955-7 Teleplg4e| Telephone : (2I3)_9s 700 Fax: (213) Fax: 955-7725 Email: Garth.Aubc{@selt
Email: Attorneys for Defendant PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP,