Case 3:07-cv-04916-MMC
Document 17
Filed 01/02/2008
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Saito, Barbara Plaintiff(s), v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Defendant(s). /
CASE NO. 07-04916 MMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
120 days from the date of the order referring to ADR to permit
other requested deadline review of electronic data by the parties before ENE
Dated:12/20/07
Dated: 12/20/07
/s/ Attorney for Plaintiff Thomas Marc Litton /s/ Attorney for Defendant Mary F. Hansbury
American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com
Case 3:07-cv-04916-MMC
Document 17
Filed 01/02/2008
Page 2 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Mediation Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 90 days from the date of this order. other 120 days from the date of this order
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 2, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Maxine M. Chesney
American LegalNet, Inc. www.USCourtForms.com