Free Order Referring Case to Mediation - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-04950-CRB

Document 19

Filed 04/15/2008

Page 1 of 2

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, State Bar No. 084965 (CA) JONATHAN T. PECK, State Bar No. 12303 (VA) SANYA P. HILL MAXION, State Bar No. 18739 (WA) U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94105-1260 Tel: 415.625.5650 Fax: 415.625.5657 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION ANDREW SATENBERG, Bar No. 17480 NOEL S. COHEN, Bar No. 219645 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 11355 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90064-1614 Telephone: 310.312.4000 Fax: 310.312.4224 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] JEFFREY KATZ, Bar No. 137246 COMMUNITY DENTAL SERVICES, INC. DBA SMILECARE 2 MacArthur Place, Suite 700 South Coast Metro, CA 92707-7705 Telephone: 714.708-5348 Fax: 714.850-3350 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff COMMUNITY DENTAL SERVICES, INC. DBA SMILECARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. COMMUNITY DENTAL SERVICES, INC., DBA SMILECARE, Defendant.

Case No. C 07-4950-CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Case 3:07-cv-04950-CRB

Document 19

Filed 04/15/2008

Page 2 of 2

1

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

2 following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to 3
participate in the following ADR process:

4 5
Court Processes: Court-sponsored Mediation Program.

6 (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 7 appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an 8 Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: _____________ April 14, 2005 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned is hereby referred to: Court-sponsored mediation program. Deadline for ADR session: 90 days from the date of this order.
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR

Private Process: Private ADR (please identify process and provider) __Not applicable_______ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: The presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

Dated: _

__________________________ Sanya Hill Maxion Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: _

__________________________ Andrew L. Satenberg Noel C. Cohen Attorneys for Defendant

UNIT ED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT U O

S

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

Judge C

. harles R

Br

R NIA

______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE eyer
NO

O IT IS S

ORDER

ED

RT

H