Free Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - District Court of California - California


File Size: 19.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: April 18, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 415 Words, 2,439 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196276/8-1.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - District Court of California ( 19.7 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-05012-SI

Document 8

Filed 04/18/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOMER E. HAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. DEBORAH DEXTER, warden, Defendants. /

No. C 07-5012 SI (pr) ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On March 4, 2008, the court ordered plaintiff, Homer Hawkins, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 "if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The order identified three prior

dismissals that appeared to count under § 1915(g) and ordered Hawkins to show cause why pauper status should not be denied and this action dismissed. The order further stated that Hawkins also could avoid dismissal by paying the filing fee by the deadline. Order To Show Cause Re. Contemplated Dismissal, p. 3. Hawkins did not pay the filing fees, did not show that any of the prior dismissals could not be counted under § 1915(g), and did not otherwise show cause why this case could not be dismissed in his response filed March 24, 2008. The court finds that the three prior dismissals identified in the order to show cause count as dismissals for purposes of § 1915(g). Hawkins

Case 3:07-cv-05012-SI

Document 8

Filed 04/18/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

does not come within any exception to the applicability of § 1915(g). Accordingly, Hawkins' in forma pauperis application is DENIED and this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The dismissal is without prejudice to Hawkins asserting his claims in an action for which he pays the full filing fee at the time he files his complaint. The clerk shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 18, 2008 ______________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

2