Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of California - California

.! .

, . 7 ! ? " :

0

Case 3:07-cv-04997-MHP CB3Document 5-2l l i I C EFiled 11/02/2007 3 4 : 5 PAX 4 1 5 1 2 6 9 6 3 3 EI? BAY ABEh O

Page 1 of 1

F X E C I . I T I V I I O F T ! C E O r T H E PI3LL5rUENT OFFICE or I.?A?IAGEUCM- o ~ i e L U C E I l WABP'IIICTCI D C . 20503

October i Z , 2006

Ms.

Sicgel

Ce11r::r io: Diologcal Divcrsitj:

ilitnna, 31 and Energy Program Director .1 P.O. Bar 549 Joshuc Trcc, CA 92252

Dear MS.S~rgel:

T11:s lcucr is in respoixe :o yosr F:-?cdom oil~.ionnstionACT pO:A) :cquesr lo the Ciificc. of Mmagerncn! and Budge! (OM%) date6 Augur: 29,2006, which was r c c c i d in 8 : s ~ K c e u n S c p t e r n b n 2006. Your requestnskedfor 4 docurnenrs rclati>g to !he developmen! :-I, 1 of the Final Rulc setting everap fuel eco!?orny stsr.dar& for Ii$h mcks lor modc! years 2005201: ( i l Fed. Reg. 17566-17679. "ru[emaliin%')rhrr %re already postec! un the Interne1 in no: Docket Xos. 2005-22223 and 2006-24309. This reqlcst includes communicariann atnong s:aE and ~ 4 t oti~ers wcrc crmtcd &wing tie dcvclopmai: of rhr Final Rule ar:d the earlier h that Proposed Rule (?O Fed. Reg.514id-51464). This rcqucst itrcludcs bur 1.5 not :irnitec lo c-mail cxclian:cs 0 orilcr C O ~ ~ C S I ~ O I I ~;ilrhong aguncy staff and betwren ngcncy srafi:rnd athcn : C~CC draR documer~ts, internal reviews and cri+iquc&rntcr-apr,cy rcvicuts. ;!gmcy rncc!ing nolcs, erc.
After ciueful review ofyour request, wo havr dctc~mincd yotlt rcqucsf is ovcrly 111~: broad and, in order to respond ro your requesl, yor? urill need to narrow the scope of yoar rfflust ir! orde: ro cllable OMB sraflio appropriately r-qonC. .4~~0rdingi)l. 0MB i s req~esringrhat you rcfinc tllc ~ c a p of your request tu iocus 011 d ~ in!orma:ion Bar is of nros: irrtelssr lo ycu. c r
Wc awair you: rcply in wri?int mi !low yor wouldlike OMB to p:ooc:
I I w c d n no1

.

""

in this request.