Free Order Dismissing Case - District Court of California - California


File Size: 20.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 19, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 688 Words, 4,166 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196294/8.pdf

Download Order Dismissing Case - District Court of California ( 20.9 kB)


Preview Order Dismissing Case - District Court of California
Case 5:07-cv-04990-JF

Document 8

Filed 03/19/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARMAINE D. WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. No. C 07-4990 JF (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14

FEDERAL BUREAU OF 15 INVESTIGATION, 16 Defendant. 17 18 / Plaintiff, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an action under the Freedom

19 of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. ยง 522, seeking records from the Federal Bureau of 20 Investigation ("F.B.I."). On January 16, 2008, Plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma 21 pauperis were granted. Plaintiff was informed that the total filing fee that ultimately would 22 be due would be $350.00. Based on Plaintiff's average monthly balances and deposits, 23 Plaintiff was ordered to file an initial partial filing fee of $270.00 within thirty days of the 24 January 16, 2008 order. Plaintiff has not paid this initial partial filing fee, nor has he 25 proffered any reason for his failure to do so. Accordingly, this action will be dismissed 26 without prejudice to filing a new action in which Plaintiff pays the required filing fee or 27 partial filing fee in a timely manner. 28 Order of Dismissal
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Jf\CR.07\Wheeler990disexhfee.wpd

Case 5:07-cv-04990-JF

Document 8

Filed 03/19/2008

Page 2 of 3

1

This action must be dismissed for a second reason as well. Plaintiff's request for

2 records has been granted, at least in part, by the federal agency, and to whatever extent her 3 request has not been granted, her claims have not been exhausted. An action to compel the 4 production of documents under FOIA is mooted when the agency in control of the requested 5 documents provides them to the plaintiff. Carter v. Veterans Admin., 780 F.2d 1479, 1481 6 (9th Cir. 1986). In addition, FOIA requires that administrative appeals be exhausted before 7 suit may be brought in federal court. Hymen v. Merit Systems Protection Bd., 799 F.2d 8 1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986). Failure to do so is grounds for dismissal for lack of subject 9 matter jurisdiction. Id.. 10 Plaintiff attaches to her complaint an October 5, 2006 letter from the Office of

United States District Court

11 Information and Privacy of the United States Department of Justice addressing her "appeal"
For the Northern District of California

12 of her request for records from the F.B.I.. The letter grants Plaintiff's request for records, 13 and remands the matter back to the F.B.I. to release to Plaintiff the records she seeks. The 14 letter further informs Plaintiff that she may appeal "any future adverse determination made 15 by the FBI." To whatever extent Plaintiff has already received the records she seeks, her 16 FOIA claims are moot. To whatever extent there are additional records the F.B.I. has not 17 given to her, she must exhaust such a claim by appealing such an "adverse determination" to 18 the Department of Justice, as described in the letter attached to her complaint.1 As any 19 outstanding FOIA claims by Plaintiff are not exhausted, they will be dismissed without 20 prejudice to refiling following exhaustion of all available administrative remedies. 21 // 22 // 23 24 25 26
1 Plaintiff does not specify 27 which records have already beenwhat particular records she seeks herein, nor does she describe given to her. 28 Order of Dismissal 2 G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Jf\CR.07\Wheeler990disexhfee.wpd

Case 5:07-cv-04990-JF

Document 8

Filed 03/19/2008

Page 3 of 3

1

For the reasons discussed above, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice

2 to refiling following exhaustion of any outstanding FOIA claims, and in an action in which 3 Plaintiff pays all required court filing fees in a timely manner. 4 5 The Clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3/14/08 JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge

6 DATED: 7 8 9 10

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Order of Dismissal G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Jf\CR.07\Wheeler990disexhfee.wpd

3