Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 53.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 19, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 460 Words, 2,877 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196326/7.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 53.5 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-05023-TEH

Document 7

Filed 12/19/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SC 9990) United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division MELANIE L. PROCTOR (CSBN 228971) [email protected] Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-6730 FAX: (415) 436-6927 Attorneys for Defendants

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has read either the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California," or the specified portions of the ADR Unit's Internet site , discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the court and private entities, and considered whether this case might benefit from any of them. Here, the parties agree that referral to a formal ADR process will not be beneficial because this mandamus action is limited to Plaintiffs' request that this Court compel Defendants to adjudicate their applications for adjustment of status. Given the substance of the action and the lack
ADR CERTIFICATION No. C 07-5023 TEH

ARMENAK CHAMLIKIAN, MARINA VARTANIAN, AND KRISTINE CHAMLIKIAN,

ROSEMARY MELVILLE, District Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; and EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. C 07-5023 TEH

JOINT REQUEST TO BE EXEMPT FROM FORMAL ADR PROCESS; PROPOSED ORDER

Case 3:07-cv-05023-TEH

Document 7

Filed 12/19/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

of any potential middle ground, ADR will only serve to multiply the proceedings and unnecessarily tax court resources. Accordingly, pursuant to ADR L.R. 3-3(c), the parties request the case be removed from the ADR Multi-Option Program and that they be excused from participating in the ADR phone conference and any further formal ADR process. Dated: December 17, 2007 Respectfully submitted, SCOTT N. SCHOOLS United States Attorney /s/ MELANIE L. PROCTOR1 Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants Dated: December 13, 2007 /s/ JONATHAN KAUFMAN Attorney for Plaintiffs ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 12/18/07

16 17 18 19

S DISTRICT TE C TA THELTON E. HENDERSON

RT U O

UNIT ED

S

United States District Judge

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Ju

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

I, Melanie L. Proctor, hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document.
ADR CERTIFICATION No. C 07-5023 TEH

1

2

A

C

LI

FO

lton E. H dge The

n enderso

R NIA

NO

RT

H