Case 3:07-cv-04992-TEH
Document 15
Filed 12/13/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PETER P. EDRINGTON, ESQ. (Bar No. 074355) EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY 2300 Contra Costa Blvd., Ste 450 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone: (925) 827-3300 Facsimile: (925) 827-3320 Attorney for Defendants, C. WILSON and BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM ODOM, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Roxanne Hendrix, Plaintiff, v. C. WILSON, individually, and in his capacity as an employee of Bay Area Rapid Transit District; BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, AND DOES 110; PEACE OFFICERS WHOSE NAMES ARE UNKNOWN, Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO.: C 07-04992 EMC
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
The parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree that defendant BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT and OFFICER C. WILSON, may have an extension up to and // // // // //
Stipulation Re Filing of Answer
1
Case 3:07-cv-04992-TEH
Document 15
Filed 12/13/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
including January 2, 2008 in which to respond to plaintiff's Complaint. DATED: December 13, 2007 EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY By ________________________________ Peter P. Edrington, Esq. Attorney for Defendants, BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT and OFFICER C. WILSON
DATED: December 13, 2007
LAW OFFICES OF WAYNE JOHNSON
By______________________________ Wayne Johnson, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants will have up to and including January 2, 2008 in which to respond to plaintiff's Complaint. DATED: December____, 2007 _______________________________ The Honorable Edward M. Chen U.S. District Magistrate Judge
Stipulation Re Filing of Answer
2