Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 13.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 13, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 303 Words, 2,017 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196343/15.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 13.2 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04992-TEH

Document 15

Filed 12/13/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PETER P. EDRINGTON, ESQ. (Bar No. 074355) EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY 2300 Contra Costa Blvd., Ste 450 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone: (925) 827-3300 Facsimile: (925) 827-3320 Attorney for Defendants, C. WILSON and BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM ODOM, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Roxanne Hendrix, Plaintiff, v. C. WILSON, individually, and in his capacity as an employee of Bay Area Rapid Transit District; BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, AND DOES 110; PEACE OFFICERS WHOSE NAMES ARE UNKNOWN, Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO.: C 07-04992 EMC

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

The parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree that defendant BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT and OFFICER C. WILSON, may have an extension up to and // // // // //
Stipulation Re Filing of Answer

1

Case 3:07-cv-04992-TEH

Document 15

Filed 12/13/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

including January 2, 2008 in which to respond to plaintiff's Complaint. DATED: December 13, 2007 EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY By ________________________________ Peter P. Edrington, Esq. Attorney for Defendants, BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT and OFFICER C. WILSON

DATED: December 13, 2007

LAW OFFICES OF WAYNE JOHNSON

By______________________________ Wayne Johnson, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants will have up to and including January 2, 2008 in which to respond to plaintiff's Complaint. DATED: December____, 2007 _______________________________ The Honorable Edward M. Chen U.S. District Magistrate Judge

Stipulation Re Filing of Answer

2