Free Report and Recommendations - District Court of California - California


File Size: 26.0 kB
Pages: 4
Date: July 1, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,182 Words, 7,475 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196356/26.pdf

Download Report and Recommendations - District Court of California ( 26.0 kB)


Preview Report and Recommendations - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-05032-MMC

Document 26

Filed 07/01/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. BACKGROUND On September 28, 2007, Plaintiff filed a complaint under Section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, and Section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), alleging that Defendant violated a collective bargaining agreement and certain Trust Agreements. The complaint sought an order requiring Defendant to permit Plaintiffs to examine Defendant's past payroll books and records for the purpose of ascertaining the amounts owed by Defendant for the period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2005; an order requiring Defendant to pay the contribution amounts determined by the audit to be due, including liquidated damages, interest, reasonable attorneys' fees, and costs; an order enjoining Defendant from violating the terms of the collective bargaining agreement and the Trust Agreements; an order retaining jurisdiction of the case, and an order for other relief as the court deems proper. On December 18, 2007, Defendant was served with the complaint. Docket No. 3. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or otherwise defend the action. On January 11, 2008, upon Plaintiff's request, the Clerk of this court entered Defendant's default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). By its default, Defendant is deemed to have admitted the well-pleaded averments of the v. CLOISTER PRESS, Defendant. / BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Plaintiff, No. C-07-05032 EDL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:07-cv-05032-MMC

Document 26

Filed 07/01/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

complaint except those as to the amount of damages. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(6). In this Motion for Default Judgment, Plaintiffs seek costs and fees, as well as the right to audit Defendant's books and records. Plaintiffs' application for default judgment against Defendant came on for hearing on July 1, 2008. Plaintiff appeared at the hearing through counsel Michael Carroll. Defendant did not appear for the hearing. II. DISCUSSION A court may not enter a default judgment against an unrepresented minor, an incompetent person, or a person in military service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2); 50 U.S.C. App. § 521(b)(1). As a corporation, Defendant is not a unrepresented minor or incompetent person, or a person in military service, or otherwise exempted from default judgment. See Complaint ¶ 3 (Defendant resides and does business in San Francisco, California); Chandler Decl. ¶ 2 (Defendant is a California corporation). Plaintiffs have the burden of proving their entitlement to relief through testimony or written affidavit. To that end, Plaintiffs submitted the declarations of: Michael Herman, Vice President at Northwest Administrators, administrators of the Printing Specialties & Paper Products Joint Employer and Union Health and Welfare Fund; Ronald D. Chandler, custodian of records of Miller, Kaplan, Arase & Co., LLP, accountants; and Michael Carroll, Plaintiff's counsel. The evidence establishes that Defendant was bound by the terms and conditions of the May 1, 2000 Wage and Scale Agreement ("Collective Bargaining Agreement"). See Herman Decl. ¶ 2, Ex. 1; Compl. ¶ 5. This agreement binds Defendant to the terms of the Agreement and Declaration of Trust of the Printing Specialties and Paper Products Joint Employer and Union Health and Welfare Fund ("Trust Agreement"). See Herman Decl. ¶ 3, Ex. 1 § 35.1. The Trust Agreement states that the Plaintiff shall have the authority to audit the payroll books and records of a participating employer. Id. ¶ 5, Ex. 2 at 24-25. The Collective Bargaining Agreement has remained in full force and effect. See id. ¶ 2. Defendant has not denied being bound by the agreement and has reported and paid contributions since the effective date of contract. Id. ¶ 2. On April 7, 2006, April 24, 2006, and November 2, 2006, Plaintiff sought access to 2

Case 3:07-cv-05032-MMC

Document 26

Filed 07/01/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant's books and records in accordance with the Collective Bargaining and Trust Agreements. Chandler Decl. ¶ 4 & Ex. 3 (telephone logs and letters). Defendant has breached the agreements by refusing access by Plaintiff's accountant to its books and records for an audit. Chandler Dec. ¶ 4; Herman Decl. ¶ 2. Plaintiff, in accordance with the relief requested in its complaint, now seeks an audit of Defendant's books and records to determine whether Defendant has made full and prompt payment of all fringe benefits during the period January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2005. Because the Collective Bargaining Agreement provides for an audit, Plaintiffs are entitled to examine Defendant's books and records. Reasonable attorney's fees and costs of action shall be awarded to a Trust Fund or Employee Benefit Plan that receives a judgment in its favor. See 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(D); Herman Decl. ¶ 4 & Ex. 2. Plaintiffs have submitted the declaration of attorney Michael Carroll to prove attorney's fees and costs. Mr. Carroll calculates that, at a rate of $185.00 per hour, attorneys' fees of $740.00 have accumulated. See Carroll Decl. at ¶ 5. The amount of time expended and the billing rate are reasonable given the work performed. Mr. Carroll calculates Plaintiffs' costs for prosecuting this action to be $400.00, consisting of the filing fee and service of process. See Carroll Decl. at ¶ 2 and Ex. 4. These costs are reasonable and should be reimbursed. III. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, and for good cause shown, it is hereby recommended that the following default judgment be entered: This Court having previously entered default against Defendant, and Plaintiffs having applied to this Court for the entry of default judgment, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Attorneys' fees and costs are awarded in the amount of $740.00 in attorney's fees, and $400.00 in costs. 2. Defendant is ordered to immediately submit to an audit. Defendant will make available to plaintiffs the following records, for the time period January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2005: time cards, payroll journals, payroll check registers, cancelled payroll checks, copies of the Employer's federal, state and local payroll tax reports, and all other documents reflecting the hours and wages of 3

Case 3:07-cv-05032-MMC

Document 26

Filed 07/01/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

employees. Any party may serve and file specific written objections to this recommendation within ten (10) working days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Civil Local Rule 72-3. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

Dated: July 1, 2008 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge

4