Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 49.1 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 27, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 658 Words, 3,714 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196393/7.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 49.1 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-05076-CRB

Document 7

Filed 12/27/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

Daniel E. Alberti (68620) [email protected] Peter J. Drobac (191079) [email protected] MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 Telephone: 650.813.5000 Facsimile: 650.813.5100 Attorneys for Defendants STUART WEITZMAN HOLDINGS, LLC (SUED AS STUART WEITZMAN RETAIL STORES, LLC, STUART WEITZMAN SAN FRANCISCO, LLC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SONJA KLIMP, on behalf of herself and All others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. STUART WEITZMAN RETAIL STORES, LLC.; STUART WEITZMAN SAN FRANCISCO, LLC, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO.: C 07 5076 CRB STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

11
A TTORN E YS A T L A W

12
P A LO A LTO

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEF. TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

CASE NO.: C 07 5076 CRB

Case 3:07-cv-05076-CRB

Document 7

Filed 12/27/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(a), it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that Defendant may have an extension of time, to and including January 7, 2008, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: December 27, 2007 THE LINDE LAW FIRM

By:

/s/ Douglas A. Linde Douglas A. Linde Chant Yedalian Erica L. Allen Attorneys for Plaintiff SONJA KLIMP

11
A TTORN E YS A T L A W

12
P A LO A LTO

Dated: December 27, 2007

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEF. TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

By:

/s/ Peter J. Drobc Daniel E. Alberti Peter J. Drobac Attorneys for Defendant STUART WEITZMAN HOLDINGS, LLC (SUED AS STUART WEITZMAN RETAIL STORES, LLC, STUART WEITZMAN SAN FRANCISCO, LLC)

2

CASE NO.: C 07 5076 CRB

Case 3:07-cv-05076-CRB

Document 7

Filed 12/27/2007

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

DECLARATION RE: SIGNATURE PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 ยง X I, Peter J. Drobac, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney at the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP, counsel of

record for Defendant Defendant Stuart Weitzman Holdings, LLC (sued as Stuart Weitzman Retail Stores, LLC and Stuart Weitzman San Francisco, LLC), in the above-captioned action. I am a member of good standing of the State Bar of California and am admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration and, if called as a witness, could and would testify competently to such facts under oath. 2. I attest that the electronic signature of Douglas A. Linde, counsel of record for

11
A TTORN E YS A T L A W

Plaintiff, Sonja Klimp, appearing in the signature block of the STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO INITIAL COMPLAINT, is the signature of Douglas A. Linde, and that I have been authorized to file the STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO INITIAL COMPLAINT on his behalf. Executed on the 27th day of December, 2007 at Palo Alto, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct.

12
P A LO A LTO

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

/s/ Peter J. Drobac

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEF. TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

3

CASE NO.: C 07 5076 CRB