Free Order Relating Case - District Court of California - California


File Size: 32.0 kB
Pages: 5
Date: June 18, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 598 Words, 3,558 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196409/22.pdf

Download Order Relating Case - District Court of California ( 32.0 kB)


Preview Order Relating Case - District Court of California
Case 4:07-cv-04446-SBA

Document 22

Filed 06/18/2008

Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination. C 06-04842 SBA C 07-04446 SBA
Elliott v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board Elliott v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board
I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. SBA

C 08-02352 EMC

Elliott v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. SBA

ORDER Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge.

Dated:___6/18/08 Judge Saundra B. Armstrong

-1-

Case 4:07-cv-04446-SBA

Document 22

Filed 06/18/2008

Page 2 of 5

Dated:________________ Judge Saundra B. Armstrong

-2-

Case 4:07-cv-04446-SBA

Document 22

Filed 06/18/2008

Page 3 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the date stated below, I lodged a copy of this order with each judicial officer and I mailed a copy to each counsel of record or pro se party in the cases listed above. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

DATED: _6/18/08

By: Deputy Clerk

-3-

Case 4:07-cv-04446-SBA

Document 22

Filed 06/18/2008

Page 4 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE S. ELLIOTT, Case Number: CV08-02352 EMC Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. SF RENT STABILIZATION et al, Defendant. /

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on June 18, 2008, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Vance S. Elliott 74 Sixth Street, #226 San Francisco, CA 94103-1608 Dated: June 18, 2008 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk

-4-

Case 4:07-cv-04446-SBA

Document 22

Filed 06/18/2008

Page 5 of 5

Copies to: Courtroom Deputies Case Systems Administrators Counsel of Record Entered into Assignment Program:

(date)

-5-