Free Case Management Statement - District Court of California - California


File Size: 54.0 kB
Pages: 4
Date: January 3, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 922 Words, 5,564 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196432/11.pdf

Download Case Management Statement - District Court of California ( 54.0 kB)


Preview Case Management Statement - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-05095-SI

Document 11

Filed 01/03/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 NEELAM CHANDNA (CSB 192972) HIRSCH ADELL (CSB 34208), and 2 J. DAVID SACKMAN (CSB 106703), Members of REICH, ADELL & CVITAN 3 A Professional Law Corporation 3550 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2000 4 Los Angeles, California 90010 Telephone: (213) 386-3860 5 Facsimile: (213) 386-5583 E-Mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 6 Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS TRUSTEES OF THE BAKERY & CONFECTIONERY 7 WESTERN CONFERENCE DENTAL FUND 8 9 10 11 12 TRUSTEES OF THE BAKERY & ] CONFECTIONERY WESTERN CONFERENCE ] 13 DENTAL FUND, ] ] 14 ] ] Plaintiffs, 15 ] ] v. 16 ] ] 17 NELDAM'S DANISH BAKERY, INC. ] ] 18 ] Defendant. ] 19 20 21 22 23 I. 24 A. 25 Defendant NELDAM'S DANISH BAKERY, INC. (DEFENDANT), a 26 California corporation, was served by substituted service of the 27 Summons and Complaint pursuant to California Code of Civil 28 -1Default by Clerk Entered on November 29, 2007 Procedural History of this Case CASE NO. C07 5095 SI CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT BY PLAINTIFFS [Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b); Local Rule 16-10] Current Date and Time of Case Management Conference: Jan. 18, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. U.S. District Court 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3483 Request that Case Management Conference Be Taken Off Calendar or that Plaintiffs Appear Telephonically UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:07-cv-05095-SI

Document 11

Filed 01/03/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 Procedure §415.20 and Fed.R.Civ.P. §4(e)(1) on October 16, 2007. 2 Service was effected on DEFENDANT by delivery of said documents to 3 DEFENDANT to the person apparently in charge at DEFENDANT'S office 4 located at 3401 Telegraph Avenue, Oakland, California 94609, with 5 mailing completed on October 23, 2007. 6 entered on November 29, 2007. 7 8 9 B. Awaiting Entry of Default Judgment Default by the Clerk was

On December 3, 2007, Plaintiffs requested this Court to enter Plaintiffs

10 default judgment against Defendant for $ 6,562.49.

11 requested that after Default Judgment was entered, the Court 12 permit Plaintiffs to file a bill of costs and a separate motion 13 for attorney's fees, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54(d) and 14 Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the Northern District, 54-1 and 15 54-6. Plaintiffs requested that the amounts for the bill of cost

16 and the attorney's fees be added to this Judgment after such 17 Judgment is entered. 18 19 C. Request that Case Management Conference Be Taken Off

20 Calendar or that Plaintiffs Appear Telephonically 21 Because Defendant has failed to make any appearance

22 whatsoever in this matter, Plaintiffs request that the Case 23 Management Conference, currently set for January 18, 2008 at 2:00 24 p.m. be taken off calendar, so that Plaintiffs do not have to 25 incur the attorneys fees and costs of traveling from Southern to 26 Northern California. Alternatively, Plaintiffs request that they

27 be permitted to appear by telephone for the Case Management 28 Conference on January 18, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. -2-

Case 3:07-cv-05095-SI

Document 11

Filed 01/03/2008

Page 3 of 4

1

D.

Request that Default Judgment Be Entered Against

2 Defendant with Permission to File Bill of Costs and Motion for 3 Attorney's Fees Thereafter 4 Finally, Plaintiffs request that: (1) they be permitted to

5 file a bill of costs and a separate motion for attorney's fees, 6 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54(d) and Local Rules of Civil 7 Procedure for the Northern District, 54-1 and 54-6; and (2) the 8 amounts for the bill of cost and the attorney's fees be added to 9 this Judgment after such Judgment is entered. 10 11 Respectfully Submitted, 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: ___________________ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3/s/ NEELAM CHANDNA Attorneys for Plaintiffs NEELAM CHANDNA, HIRSCH ADELL, and J. DAVID SACKMAN, Members of REICH, ADELL & CVITAN A Professional Law Corporation

Case 3:07-cv-05095-SI

Document 11

Filed 01/03/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2

PROOF OF SERVICE

3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 4 5 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the 6 within action; my business address is 3550 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2000, Los Angeles, California 90010. 7 On January 3, 2008, I served the foregoing document described 8 as CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT BY PLAINTIFFS on the interested parties(s) by placing. 9 10 the original X a true copy thereof

11 enclosed in a sealed envelope and addressed as set forth: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4/s/ Maria Hoang Executed on January 3, 2008, at Los Angeles, California. x (Federal Court) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. (By Fax) The facsimile machine I used complied with California Rules of Court 2003(3) and no error was reported by the machine. Pursuant to rule 2005(i), I caused the machine to print a transmission record of the transmission. x (By Mail) As follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.