Free Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of California - California


File Size: 39.1 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 3, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 624 Words, 3,811 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196432/8.pdf

Download Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of California ( 39.1 kB)


Preview Motion for Default Judgment - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-05095-SI

Document 8

Filed 12/03/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 NEELAM CHANDNA (CSB 192972) HIRSCH ADELL (CSB 34208), and 2 J. DAVID SACKMAN (CSB 106703), Members of REICH, ADELL & CVITAN 3 A Professional Law Corporation 3550 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2000 4 Los Angeles, California 90010 Telephone: (213) 386-3860 5 Facsimile: (213) 386-5583 E-Mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 6 Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS TRUSTEES OF THE BAKERY & CONFECTIONERY 7 WESTERN CONFERENCE DENTAL FUND 8 9 10 11 12 TRUSTEES OF THE BAKERY & ] CONFECTIONERY WESTERN CONFERENCE ] 13 DENTAL FUND, ] ] 14 ] ] Plaintiffs, 15 ] ] v. 16 ] ] 17 NELDAM'S DANISH BAKERY, INC. ] ] 18 ] Defendant. ] 19 20 21 Upon the default of the Defendant NELDAM'S DANISH BAKERY, 22 INC., a California corporation (NELDAM'S DANISH BAKERY), to the 23 Complaint filed October 3, 2007, Judgment is hereby entered 24 against Defendant NELDAM'S DANISH BAKERY, and in favor of 25 Plaintiffs TRUSTEES OF THE BAKERY & CONFECTIONERY WESTERN 26 CONFERENCE DENTAL FUND, as follows: 27 / / / 28 -1CASE NO. C07 5095 SI [PROPOSED] CLERK'S JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT NELDAM'S DANISH BAKERY, INC. [Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(1)] [NO HEARING REQUIRED] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:07-cv-05095-SI

Document 8

Filed 12/03/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 / / / 2 3 4 5 6 7 After Default Judgment is entered, Plaintiffs shall file a Delinquent Contributions $ 5,253.00 Interest on Contributions Liquidated Damages TOTAL: $ 258.89

$ 1,050.60 $ 6,562.49

8 bill of costs and a separate motion for attorney's fees, pursuant 9 to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54(d) and Local Rules of Civil Procedure for 10 the Northern District, 54-1 and 54-6. Plaintiffs request that the

11 amounts for the bill of cost and the attorney's fees be added to 12 this Judgment after such Judgment is entered. 13 14 Dated: ___________________ 15 16 17 18 19 Submitted by: 20 REICH, ADELL & CVITAN 21 A Professional Law Corporation 22 23 By: 24 25 26 27 28 -2/s/ NEELAM CHANDNA Attorneys for Plaintiffs _____________________________ Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California

Case 3:07-cv-05095-SI

Document 8

Filed 12/03/2007

Page 3 of 3

1 2

PROOF OF SERVICE

3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 4 5 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the 6 within action; my business address is 3550 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2000, Los Angeles, California 90010. 7 On December 3, 2007, I served the foregoing document 8 described as [PROPOSED] CLERK'S JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT NELDAM'S DANISH BAKERY, INC. on the interested 9 parties(s) by placing. 10 the original 11 enclosed in a sealed envelope and addressed as set forth: 12 13 x 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 x 22 23 Executed on December 3, 2007, at Los Angeles, California. 24 25 Maria Hoang 26 27 28 -3(Federal Court) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. (By Mail) As follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. (By Fax) The facsimile machine I used complied with California Rules of Court 2003(3) and no error was reported by the machine. Pursuant to rule 2005(i), I caused the machine to print a transmission record of the transmission. X a true copy thereof