Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-05099-JSW

Document 37

Filed 03/19/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. Rockseth-Shipman, Defendant. / JLT Aerospace (North America) Inc, Plaintiff, No. CV07-05099 JSW ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 13 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 14 ORDERED that: 15 A. 16 Trial Date: 17 Pretrial Conference: Monday, 4/6/2009, at 2:00 p.m. 18 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 1/9/2009, 9:00 a.m. 19 Close of Expert Discovery: 3/27/2009 20 Close of Non-expert Discovery: 11/14/2008 21 Further Case Management Conference: 8/8/2008, 1:30 p.m. 22 B. 23 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 25 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of 26 non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 27 supplementation has been completed. 28 DISCOVERY 4/27/2009, at 8:30 a.m., 5 - 10 days DATES

Case 3:07-cv-05099-JSW

Document 37

Filed 03/19/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

C.

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

This matter is referred to court-connected mediation, to be conducted by July 14, 2008, if possible. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved at the mediation. D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER

No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 19, 2008

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2