Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 14.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 21, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 356 Words, 2,156 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/196478/46.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 14.4 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-05115-JSW

Document 46

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP SHERI FLAME EISNER #162776 [email protected] DAVID L. STANTON # 208079 [email protected] 725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5406 Telephone: (213) 488-7100 Facsimile: (213) 629-1033 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP JOHN M. GRENFELL #88500 [email protected] 50 Fremont Street Post Office Box 7880 San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 Telephone: (415) 983-1000 Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 Attorneys for Defendant NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DOE, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

No. C 07-5115 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE

18 vs. 19 NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC, 20 Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
600463373v1

Judge: Date:
Time: CrtRm:

Hon. Jeffrey S. White January 25, 2008
9:00 a.m. 2

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE Case No. C 07-5115 JSW

Case 3:07-cv-05115-JSW

Document 46

Filed 12/21/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

After full consideration of the pleadings, records and files herein, and the authorities submitted by counsel, the Court finds that Defendant Network Solutions, LLC properly filed the following motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(g), Local Rule 7-2, and this Court's standing order: (1) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6); (2) Motion to Strike Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f); and (3) Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3), or in the Alternative to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง1406(a), for Improper Venue. Based on these findings, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Dated:

Jeffrey S. White Judge of the United States District Court

600463373v1

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE Case No. C 07-5115 JSW