Free Case Management Scheduling Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-05113-JSW

Document 12

Filed 01/14/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. San Francisco Culinary Bartenders & Service Employ, Defendant. / Suguitan, Plaintiff, No. CV07-05113 JSW ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further ORDERED that: A. Trial Date: DATES 12/8/2008, at 8:30 a.m., 2 days

Pretrial Conference: Monday, 11/24/2008, at 2:00 p.m. Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 9/19/2008, 9:00 a.m. Last Day for Expert Disclosure: 7/14/2008 Close of Non-expert Discovery: 6/30/2008 B. DISCOVERY

The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all supplementation has been completed.

Case 3:07-cv-05113-JSW

Document 12

Filed 01/14/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

C.

PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER

No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2008

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 3:07-cv-05113-JSW

Document 12

Filed 01/14/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUANITA E. SUGUITAN et al, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 10 Defendant. SAN FRANCISCO CULINARY BARTENDERS AND SERVICE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND et al, /

Case Number: CV07-05113 JSW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on January 14, 2008, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. John E. Suguitan 25001 La Union Gonzales, Tubao Phillipines, 20001 Juanita Suguitan 25001 La Union Gonzales, Tubao Phillipines, 20001 Peter Warren Saltzman Shawn C Groff Leonard Carder, LLP 1330 Broadway, Suite 1450 Oakland, CA 94612 Dated: January 14, 2008 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk