Free Claim Construction Chart - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 77.6 kB
Pages: 7
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,542 Words, 10,234 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8210/281.pdf

Download Claim Construction Chart - District Court of Delaware ( 77.6 kB)


Preview Claim Construction Chart - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-00858-SLR

Document 281

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LML PATENT CORP., Plaintiff, v. TELECHECK SERVICES, INC., ELECTRONIC CLEARING HOUSE, INC., XPRESSCHEX, INC. and NOVA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants. JOINT PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT Pursuant to the Court's Rule 16 Scheduling Order in this matter, the Parties hereby submit the following claim charts to present their respective, proposed constructions of disputed claim terms and their proposed constructions of agreed claim terms in the patent-in-suit, namely, U.S. Patent No. 5,484,988 ("the `988 patent"). C.A. 04-858 (SLR)

Proposed Constructions of Disputed Claim Terms
Plaintiff's Proposed Construction Any regular check used to draw funds from a normal bank or credit union checking account Defendants' Proposed Construction any type of check drawn on a financial institution

Claim Term any bank check (claims 1, 8)

Case 1:04-cv-00858-SLR

any consumer bank check (claim 9) Any regular check used to draw funds from a normal bank or credit union consumer checking account LML believes that this term should not be separately construed from the entire element in which it appears in the claims, namely the "any bank check" or "any consumer bank check" language construed below. In any event, this plain English term needs no construction. Information relating to a consumer's bank account including the MICR line (magnetic ink character recognition line) Where the paper check is used as a source of information, and is not accepted or processed Where the paper check is used as a source of information, and is not accepted or processed

same meaning as the phrase "any bank check" set forth above, with the added limitation that the check be "drawn against a consumer bank account" one or some indiscriminately of whatever kind

Document 281

any (claims 1, 8, 9)

consumer bank account information (claims 1, 2, 3, 8, 9)

only the ABA/transit routing number and bank account number the bank check, at no time, takes on the status of a negotiable instrument the check, at no time, takes on the status of a negotiable instrument

Filed 10/07/2005

without using the bank check as a negotiable instrument (claim 1)

Page 2 of 7

without using the check as a negotiable instrument (claim 8)

Claim Term without using a bank check as a negotiable instrument (claim 9) Subsequently transmitting the information relating to the transaction to a bank for subsequent automated clearing house operations

Plaintiff's Proposed Construction Where the paper check is used as a source of information, and is not accepted or processed

Defendants' Proposed Construction the check, at no time, takes on the status of a negotiable instrument electronically communicating with an automated clearing house for transferring funds electronically based upon the consumer bank account information obtained from any bank check presented at the point-of-sale electronically communicating with an automated clearing house for transferring funds electronically based upon the consumer bank account information obtained from any bank check presented at the point-of-sale Defendants contend that this term needs no construction. adapted to read consumer bank account information directly from any bank check

Case 1:04-cv-00858-SLR

subsequently transmitting the transaction event information to a bank for subsequent automated clearing house operations (claim 8) Enabling communication with an automated clearing house for electronically transferring funds

enabling automated clearing house communication for transferring funds (claims 1, 9)

Document 281

for the sole purpose (claims 2, 8 and 9) For the only purpose

Filed 10/07/2005

adapted to receive consumer bank account information from any bank check (claim 1)

adapted to receive consumer bank account information from any bank check

Page 3 of 7

2

Claim Term means for reading magnetic ink character recognition numbers appearing on a consumer check (claim 2) The recited function is " reading magnetic ink character recognition numbers appearing on a consumer check." The structures in the `988 patent that perform that function is any mechanism such as a MICR check reader, optical character recognition (" OCR" ) equipment, a keyboard for manual entry, or equivalent.

Plaintiff's Proposed Construction This limitation should be construed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 112(6).

Defendants' Proposed Construction This limitation should be construed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 112(6). The recited function is " reading magnetic ink character recognition numbers appearing on a consumer check." The structures described in the `988 patent that perform that function are a MICR reader and optical character recognition equipment.

Case 1:04-cv-00858-SLR

Document 281

reading means for reading magnetic ink This limitation should be construed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 112(6). character recognition numbers on any consumer bank check (claim 9) The recited function is " reading magnetic ink character recognition numbers appearing on a consumer check." The structures in the `988 patent that perform that function is any mechanism such as a MICR check reader, optical character recognition (" OCR" ) equipment, a keyboard for manual entry, or equivalent.

This limitation should be construed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 112(6). The recited function is " reading magnetic ink character recognition numbers on any consumer bank check." The structures described in the `988 patent that perform that function are a MICR reader and optical character recognition equipment.

Filed 10/07/2005

verifying that account numbers were accurately read at the point of sale (claim 8)

Verifying that the account numbers from visually confirming that account numbers the check were read accurately at the point were accurately read by reference to the of sale terminal source document

Page 4 of 7

3

Proposed Constructions of Agreed Claim Terms
Claim Term Parties' Agreed Proposed Construction person, business or corporation This function is written in means-plus-function format pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 112(6). The recited function of this limitation is enabling said central computer system to communicate with external databases for performing a consumer bank account status search and further enabling automated clearing house communication for transferring funds without using the [a] bank check as a negotiable instrument.

Case 1:04-cv-00858-SLR

consumer (claim 9)

second communication means enabling said central computer system to communicate with external databases for performing a consumer bank account status search and further enabling automated clearing house communication for transferring funds without using the bank check as a negotiable instrument (claim 1); second communication means enabling said central computer system to communicate with external databases for performing a consumer bank account status search and further enabling automated clearing house communication for transferring funds without using a bank check as a negotiable instrument (claim 9)

Document 281

automated clearing house (claims 1, 8, 9)

The structures disclosed in the patent for performing the recited function of this limitation are a modem, network interface, enhanced radio transmission interface, satellite communication interface or equivalent.1 an automated clearing house including, but not limited to, the national U.S. clearing house sometimes referred to as the " ACH"

Filed 10/07/2005

1

While the parties agree to the recited function of this claim element pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 112(6), the parties dispute the meaning of limitations within that function, as set forth in the Parties' Proposed Construction of Disputed Claim Terms and the parties' briefs.

Page 5 of 7

4

Case 1:04-cv-00858-SLR

Document 281

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 6 of 7

DATED: October 7, 2005 /s/ Mary B. Matterer Richard K. Herrmann (I.D. No. 405) Mary B. Matterer (I.D. No. 2696) MORRIS JAMES HITCHENS & WILLIAMS LLP 222 Delaware Avenue, 10th Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19801 302.888.6800 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff LML Patent Corp. /s/ Timothy Devlin William J. Marsden, Jr. (I.D. No. 2247) Timothy Devlin (I.D. No. 4241) Sean Hayes (I.D. No. 4413) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 919 North Market Street, Suite 1000 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 302.652.5070 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Defendant TeleCheck Services, Inc. /s/ Francis DiGiovanni Francis DiGiovanni (I.D. No. 3189) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP The Nemours Building 1007 N. Orange Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 302.658.9141 [email protected] Counsel for Defendants Electronic Clearing House, Inc. and Xpresschex, Inc. /s/ Richard D. Kirk (rk0922) Richard D. Kirk (I.D. No. 922) THE BAYARD FIRM 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 Wilmington, DE 19801 302.429.4208 [email protected] Counsel for Defendant NOVA Information Systems, Inc.

5

Case 1:04-cv-00858-SLR

Document 281

Filed 10/07/2005

Page 7 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 7, 2005, I electronically filed a JOINT PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing(s) to the following: Richard K. Herrmann Mary B. Matterer, Esq. Morris James Hitchens & Williams 222 Delaware Avenue, 10th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801-4226 Richard D. Kirk, Esq. The Bayard Firm 222 Delaware Avenue, 9th Floor Wilmington, DE 19899 Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Esq. Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP The Nemours Building 1007 North Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19801 I hereby certify that on October 7, 2005, I have sent by Electronic mail, the document(s) to the following non-registered participants: Robert Jacobs, Esq. Belasco Jacobs & Townsley, LLP Howard Hughes Center 6100 Center Drive, Suite 630 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Russell E. Levine, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP 200 E. Randolph Dr. Chicago, IL 60601

Mark C. Scarsi, Esq. O'Melveny & Myers LLP 400 S Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071 /s/ Timothy Devlin Timothy Devlin

6