Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv-00858-SLR Document 312 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
LML PATENT CORP., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 04-858 SLR
)
TELECHECK SERVICES, INC., )
ELECTRONIC CLEARING HOUSE, INC., )
XPRESSCHEX, INC., AND )
NOVA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. )
)
Defendants.
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NO. 1:
FOR A RULING THAT TELECHECK INFRINGES CLAIMS
1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, AND 16 OF THE ‘988 PATENT
Plaintiff LML hereby moves the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 for an order
granting summary judgment that TeleCheck infringes claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 16 of the
‘988 Patent. In support of this motion, LML relies- accom an ng memorandum.
DATED: October 28, 2005 _
Richard K. H ann #405
Mary B. Mat rer #2696
MORRIS I ES HITCHENS &
WILL S LLP
222 Delaware Avenue, 10th Floor
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
(302) 888-6800
rhe1rmann@morrisj ames.com
mmatterer@morrisj ames.com
Russell E. Levine, P.C.
Jamie H. McDole
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 861-2000
Attorneys for LML Patent Corp.
l

Case 1:04-cv-00858-SLR Document 312 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
LML PATENT CORP., )
Plaintiff, J
v. J Civil Action No. O4-858 SLR
TELECHECK SERVICES, INC., J
ELECTRONIC CLEARING HOUSE, INC., )
XPRESSCHEX, INC., AND )
NOVA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. )
Defendants. )
ORDER
The Court having considered LML PATENT CORP.’S MEMORANDUM IN
SUPPORT OF LML’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NO. l: FOR A RULING
THAT TELECHECK INFRINGES CLAIMS l, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, l0, ll, AND 16 OF THE ‘988
PATENT and the parties’ argiunents in support and opposition thereof,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this day of , 2005, that
the motion is GRANTED.
f Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00858-SLR Document 312 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the 28th day of October, 2005, I electronically filed the
foregoing document, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NO. 1: FOR A RULING
THAT TELECHECK INFRINGES CLAIMS 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, AND 16 OF THE ‘988
PATENT, with the Clerk of the Court using Cl\/I/ECF which will send notification of such filing
to the following:
Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Esq. William J. Marsden, Jr., Esq.
Francis DiGiovanni, Esq. Timothy Devlin, Esq.
V Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP Fish & Richardson, P.C.
1007 North Orange Street 919 North Market Street, Suite 1100
Wilmington, DE 19801 Wilmington, DE 19801
Richard D. Kirk, Esq.
The Bayard Firm
222 Delaware Avenue, 9th Floor
Wilmington, DE 19801
Additionally, I hereby certify that on the 28th day of October, 2005, the foregoing
document was served via email and via federal express on the following non—registered
participants:
Robert Jacobs, Esq. Mark C. Scarsi, Esq.
Mark B. Mizrahi, Esq. Vision L. Winter, Esq.
Belasco Jacobs & Townsley, LLP O’Melveny & Myers LLP
Howard Hughes Center 400 South Hope Street
6100 Center Drive, Suite 630 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Richard He (#405)
Mary B. Mat rer (#2696)
MORRIS, J ES, HITCHENS & WILLIAMS LLP
222 Delaware Avenue, 10th Floor
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
(302) 888-6800
[email protected]
[email protected] I
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LML PATENT CORP.