Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 78.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 425 Words, 2,592 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8226/217-1.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 78.3 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv—00874—Gl\/IS Document 217 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
Yotmo CoNAwAv STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
THE BRANDYWINE BUILDING
1000 WEsT STREET, 171*1-1 FLooR
JOSY W- INGERSOLL CN0· IOB8) Wrmmcrow, DELAWARE 19801 (302) 571-6600
DIRECT DIAL: 302-571-6672 (302) 571-1253 FAX
DIRECT FAX: $02-5763301 no. Box 391 (800) 253-2234 (DE osu)
[email protected] WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19899-0391 WWw.y0ungc0naWay.c0m
July 13, 2006
BY E-FILING
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
United States District Court
844 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: T elccrclia Technologies, Inc. v. Alcatel USA, Inc.
Civil Action No. 04-874-GMS
Dear Judge Sleet:
On July 10, 2006, Defendant Alcatel USA, Inc. ("Alcatel") timely filed a Motion
for Mandatory Stay of Proceedings pursuant to 28 USC § l659(a), requesting the Court to enter a
stay of the current action. There is no question that the requested stay should be granted because,
pursuant to the statute, "the district court shall stay proceedings in the civil action" (emphasis
added) where, as here, Alcatel is a Respondent in the ITC Investigation instituted by Telcordia,
which alleges inliingement of the same patents asserted against Alcatel in this action.
Moreover, Telcordia’s July ll, 2006 letter to Your Honor acknowledges Alcatel’s
"statuto1y right (under 28 USC §l659) to stay the action before this Court," and expresses no
objection to Your Honor promptly granting Alcatel’s Motion.
Because the next round of expert reports in this action will be due next Friday, and
Alcatel wishes to avoid the continuing expense of defending against Telcordia’s patent claims
here while it is simultaneously defending against them in the ITC (which is the underlying
purpose of the mandatory stay provision), Alcatel would appreciate Your Honor approving the
Order Granting Motion (a copy of which is annexed hereto) at your earliest convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
lm . gy www 6@
Jos W. Ingersoll (No. 1088) 4
J Wlzcg
I Enclosure °
1
1512.01:21-16351.1 063s3s.1001

Case 1:04-cv—00874—G|\/IS Document 217 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 2 of 2
YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet I
April l2, 2006
Page 2
cc: Clerk of the Court (by e—1;iling and hand delivery)
Steven J. Balick, Esquire (by e—f1ling and e-mail)
Donald R. Dunner, Esquire (by e~mail)
Dori O. Burley, Esquire (by e-mail) _
Richard J. Smith, Esquire (by e-mail)
Vincent P. Kovalick, Esquire (by e—mail)
Stuart J. Sinder, Esquire (by e—mail)
DB0l:2l4635l.l 0635351001