Free Motion for Partial Summary Judgment - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-00876-GMS

Document 245

Filed 10/05/2006

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TELCORDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. _____________________________________________ TELCORDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. _____________________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No. 04-875-GMS

Civil Action No. 04-876-GMS

PLAINTIFF TELCORDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT THE '306 PATENT IS NOT INVALID AS ANTICIPATED OR FOR LACK OF ENABLEMENT For the reasons stated in the accompanying brief, Telcordia respectfully moves, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, for partial summary judgment that Defendants cannot prevail on their invalidity theories of anticipation and lack of enablement with respect to the '306 patent because there is no genuine issue of material fact and Telcordia is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Defendants' expert admits that eight of the eleven references on which Defendants rely do not anticipate under the Court's claim construction. The remaining three references do not contain all the limitations of the '306 claims in a single reference. As for Defendants' enablement defense, Defendants offered no expert report, no expert testimony, and no testimony from any

Case 1:04-cv-00876-GMS

Document 245

Filed 10/05/2006

Page 2 of 4

other witness to support their defense that the claims are not enabled, and therefore they cannot satisfy their burden of showing invalidity through clear and convincing evidence.

ASHBY & GEDDES /s/ Steven J. Balick Steven J. Balick (I.D. #2114) John G. Day (I.D. #2403) Tiffany Geyer Lydon (I.D. #3950) Ashby & Geddes 222 Delaware Avenue, 17th Floor P.O. Box 1150 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1150 (302) 654-1888 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Telcordia Technologies, Inc.

Of Counsel: Donald R. Dunner Don O. Burley Richard H. Smith Houtan K. Esfahani Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-4413 (202) 408-4000 York M. Faulkner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P. Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Square Reston, VA 20190-5675 (650) 849-6600 Dated: October 5, 2006
173931.1

Case 1:04-cv-00876-GMS

Document 245

Filed 10/05/2006

Page 3 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 5th day of October, 2006, the attached PLAINTIFF TELCORDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT THE '306 PATENT IS NOT INVALID AS ANTICIPATED OR FOR LACK OF ENABLEMENT was served upon the below-named counsel of record at the address and in the manner indicated:

John W. Shaw, Esquire Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Steven C. Cherny, Esquire Latham & Watkins LLP 885 Third Avenue, Suite 1000 New York, NY 10022 David A. Nelson, Esquire Latham & Watkins LLP Sears Tower, Suite 5800 Chicago, IL 60606 David M. Farnum, Esquire Latham & Watkins LLP 555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20004-1304 Sean S. Pak, Esquire Latham & Watkins 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esquire Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell 1201 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899-1347

HAND DELIVERY

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

HAND DELIVERY

Case 1:04-cv-00876-GMS

Document 245

Filed 10/05/2006

Page 4 of 4

Matthew D. Powers, Esquire Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

/s/ Steven J. Balick Steven J. Balick
172095.1