Free Declaration - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 59.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 331 Words, 2,224 Characters
Page Size: 792.96 x 612.48 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8236/71-19.pdf

Download Declaration - District Court of Delaware ( 59.5 kB)


Preview Declaration - District Court of Delaware
Case1:04-cv—00884-SLR D0cument71-19 Filed 07/17/2006 Page10f3
E h 'b 't 1 3

,2; Case 1:04-cv-00884-SLR A Document 71-19 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 2 of 3
COFY we
,;—‘:* . { i
‘ _ . 1 * MAY 2 2 20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ‘ D_ `''' ·_ ' .
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK " " ‘`‘‘‘"
FERRING B.V. and ) _
` AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., )
) Case No: 02 CV 9851 (CLB) (MDF)
Plaintiffs, ) ‘
) DEFENDANT BARR
-against- ) LABORATORIES, INC., AND
) PLAINTIFF S AVENTIS
BARR LABORATORIES, INC., ) PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND
FERRING B.V.’S STIPULATION FOR
` EXTENSION OF TIME
) .
Defendant. )
)

‘ ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME ‘
Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Extension of Time to File for Attomey U
Fees and Taxable Costs submitted by Defendant Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Plaintiffs
Ferring B.V. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and consistent with precedent;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: _ C · _ l l
1. The parties Stipulation for Extension of Time to File for Attomey Fees and
Taxable Costs is GRANTED; and n
2. The briefing schedule for the tiling of any applications of attorney fees
(including under 35 U.S.C. §285) and/or costs and any opposition and
· subsequent reply is as follows: ` ..
I F a. Barr Laboratories’ motion for attomey fees and costs would be due 30 days I
5 _ alter the United States Supreme Court’s denial of Plaintiffs’ petition for writ
` S of certiorari or resolution of Plaintii°fs’ appeal if Plaintiffs’ petition is granted;
·< .
uz M E
{3 M .
Z F 2 at i 2
'< ··——*
2 F F?
·u § ·

if} _ Case 1:04-cv-00884-SLR Document 71-19 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 3 of 3
‘ b. Plaimiffs’ opposition to Barr’s motion would be due 30 days aiier the filing. 4
V of Ba11·’s motion; and
c. Barr Laboratories’ reply brief would be due 30 days after the filing of
» P1aintiffs’ opposition.
5*0 OA péeév .1
ww; 1//WM ·"‘ ¥
Dated: May 7/ L, 2006
= i Gaaoewr, Lg we-
The Honorable Charles L. Brieant
United States District Judge