Free Reply Brief - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv—00884-SLR Document 73-2 Filed 07/31/2006 Page1 0f2
EXHIBIT A

Ca 1 : - - - .
se 04 cv 00884 SLR Document 73-2 Filed 07/31 /2006 Page 2 012
Mci) crmott.
__ Will &Etttoty
I button www Glicago uaicoeesn Lonoon tnnnnqetee Mum! niuom Dhnctlno A. P9?
N•t~v‘foNt ¢`}r¤M¤€¤tnlY Rum: suulliego Diliunn Voihy Wrwhir¤¤|M_ UL;. GP*9°@m‘*'°·°°m
212»G»47·5·4’14
June l6, 2006
VIA Emu!. (WSLL}AM.LONG@S.¤l»BLAW.C0t\1) AND U.S. MALL.
William 1*. Long
Sutherland. Asbill Ez Bmnnan LLP
999 Pcachtroo Stroot, NE
Atlanta. Georgia 303 09-3 996
Rc: Forrbzg B.¥¤€ v. Teva Pharm¢zccutic¢:!1ndr¢r!rie.v, Lid., (LA. No. 04-884-SLR
Client-Matter No. 0]§1Q5~i!l¥12
Dom: Mr. Long:
As previously stated, in View of thc Federal Circuits denial of`F::t1‘it1g’s Combined Petition for
Panel Rehearing and Rnhrziritig En Banc in the Ferring tr. Burr matter, thc stay in the above-
rx captioned matte: is no longer in effect.
However, Porting intends to tile at petition for writ nfoeitiornri to the United States Supreme
Court. We tlierefore propose seeking e stay of all proceedings (including Teva' s motion for
attorneys fees) pending thc resolution of Ferrings petition to the Supreme Coon.
This is precisely what has occured in the Fsrrirtg v. Barr matter-tho District Court has sts.:/€>d
Boris ottomcys fees motion pending thc resolution of the petition to the Supreme Court. _
Please let us know as soon as possible whether you are sirneneble to snlomittirtg o stipulation to
this effect.
Sincerely,
Christine A. Pope
Nw; 1043297-l.0'TS105.0012
g"\
U.S.pm:sloo omtrtuclnrl through McUor1‘n¤llVYl¤&£ seo Msdivsn Avenue new Tour, Naw mnt 1001 1-4010 'l'¤lopho¤•:5t11.54¥*ié0¤ rncslmlle; 2.·tz.2S¤?.:44·l www.m·vc.¤¤¤¤
“§`G?§¥lL,. P. @3