Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-00884-SLR Document 87 Filed O3/16/2007 Page 1 ot 1
CONNOLLY BOVEI LODGE 8c HUTZ LLP
Arronmavs AT 1.Aw
wirmmerom, mz
The Nemours Building
1007 North Orange St.
P.O. Box 2207
Wilmington, DE 19899
nar: (302} ess 9141
Francis DiGicvanni mx; (302) ess 5614
Famer WEB: www.cblh.com
rss. (302) 888-6316
rnx (302) 658-5614
emma. [email protected]
msvtv ·r¤ Vlhlmington Oftice
March 16, 2007
l
VIA Ecu
Chief Judge Sue L. Robinson
United States District Court
District of Delaware
844 North King Street ·
Wilmington, DE 19801
Re: Ferring B. V v. Teva Pharms. USA, Civ. No. O4-884-SLR
Dear Chief Judge Robinson:
We write pursuant to D. Del. LR 7.l.2(c) to advise the Court ofthe status of proceedings
in the case of F erring B. V v. Barr Labs., No. 02-CV-9851 (S.D.N.Y), that are relevant to
defendant Teva’s motion for attorneys’ fees (D.I. 61) pending in the instant case.
` On March 1, 2007, Judge Brieant in Ferring v. Barr held oral argument on and denied
trom the bench defendant Barr’s motion for attomeys’ fees. As the Court will recall, Teva’s
motion for attorneys’ fees currently before the Court mimics Ba1r’s very argument that has now
been rejected by Judge Brieant.
An excerpt from the Ferrirzg v. Barr PACER Docket is attached hereto, indicating that a {
bench ruling was rendered. Ferring has ordered the transcript from that oral argument (that
contains the bench ruling) and expects to be able to submit it to the Court early next week.
Respectfully submitted,
Francis DiGiovanni
Enclosure
cc: 7 7Cl€l@fifl1E7C01TflT(V1HFlTHHd)" tiii
Dennis J. Mondolino, Esq. (Via e-mail)
J osy W. Ingersoll, Esq. (Via Hand and e-mail)
William F. Long, Esq. (Via e-mail)
527669_1
wrrmiuercw, ue WASHINGTON, oc ros Aweeuas, cn J