Free Order Dismissing Case - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 37.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: April 20, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 299 Words, 1,821 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8252/11.pdf

Download Order Dismissing Case - District Court of Delaware ( 37.0 kB)


Preview Order Dismissing Case - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-00900-G|\/IS Document 11 Filed 04/20/2005 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
RICHARD L. LEWIS, }
Plaintiff, g
v. g Civ. N0. 04-900-GMS
THOMAS L. CARROLL, WARDEN, g
ROBERT GEORGE, WARDEN, VINCE )
BIANCO, WARDEN, STANLEY )
TAYLOR, COMMISSIONER, PAUL )
HOWARD, BUREAU CHIEF, )
Defendants. g
ORDER
WHEREAS, the plaintiff filed a civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without prepayment of the filing
fee:
WHEREAS, on October 20, 2004, this Court entered an
order granting leave to proceed in fgrmg pauperis and requiring
the plaintiff to complete and return an authorization form (D.I.
6):
WHEREAS, on October 20, 2004, the order was mailed to
the plaintiff at the Howard R. Young Correctional Institution,
where the plaintiff indicated he was incarcerated;
WHEREAS, on November 9, 2004, the order was returned to
the court as undeliverable (D.I. 7);
WHEREAS, on November l5, 2004, the court received a
letter from the plaintiff indicating that he was incarcerated at

Case 1:04-cv-00900-G|\/IS Document 11 Filed 04/20/2005 Page 2 of 2
the Chester County Prison, located in Chester County,
Pennsylvania (D.I. 8);
WHEREAS, on November I5 2004, the order was mailed to
the plaintiff at the Chester County Prison;
WHEREAS, on December l, 2004, the order was returned to
the court as undeliverable (D.I. 9);
WHEREAS, on December I3, 2004, the court received a
letter from the plaintiff, indicating his new address (D.I. I0);
WHEREAS, the plaintiff no action has been taken in this
matter for a period of at least three months;
THEREFORE, at Wilmington this Ljfgay of ééf{¥ , 2005,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to D. Del. L.R. 41.1 (1995).
* ; ,
Uni ed Sta es Distri ud
2