Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-00901-JJF

Document 400-2

Filed 03/02/2007

Page 1 of 7

Illumina's Objections to Affymetrix's Proposed Trial Demonstratives Submitted March 2, 2007

Affymetrix Draft Demos 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

Illumina's Objection* F, S, O, P F, S, O, P F, S, O, P F, S, O, P F, P F, H, P F, H, P F, H, P F, S, O, P F, S, O, P F, S, O, P F, S, O, P

E, IS E, IS

H, P F, S, O, P F, S, O, P R, P

Page 1 of 6

Case 1:04-cv-00901-JJF

Document 400-2

Filed 03/02/2007

Page 2 of 7

Illumina's Objections to Affymetrix's Proposed Trial Demonstratives Submitted March 2, 2007

Affymetrix Draft Demos 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76

Illumina's Objection*

F, P F, P F, P F, P

F, E, P F, E, P R, P R R, P MIL3, Inc, P, R F, P, R F, P, R

Page 2 of 6

Case 1:04-cv-00901-JJF

Document 400-2

Filed 03/02/2007

Page 3 of 7

Illumina's Objections to Affymetrix's Proposed Trial Demonstratives Submitted March 2, 2007

Affymetrix Draft Demos 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114

Illumina's Objection*

F, P F, P F, P F, P F, P F, P F, P F, P F, P

F, P

Page 3 of 6

Case 1:04-cv-00901-JJF

Document 400-2

Filed 03/02/2007

Page 4 of 7

Illumina's Objections to Affymetrix's Proposed Trial Demonstratives Submitted March 2, 2007

Affymetrix Draft Demos Illumina's Objection* 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 F, S, O, P 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138

Page 4 of 6

Case 1:04-cv-00901-JJF

Document 400-2

Filed 03/02/2007

Page 5 of 7

Illumina's Objections to Affymetrix's Proposed Trial Demonstratives Submitted March 2, 2007

Affymetrix Draft Demos Illumina's Objection* 139 F, P

Page 5 of 6

Case 1:04-cv-00901-JJF

Document 400-2

Filed 03/02/2007

Page 6 of 7

Illumina's Objections to Affymetrix's Proposed Trial Demonstratives Submitted March 2, 2007

Affymetrix Draft Demos 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148

Illumina's Objection* F, P F, P F, P F, P F, P F, P F, P F, P F, P

*Illumina's key to its objections is attached.

Page 6 of 6

Case 1:04-cv-00901-JJF

Document 400-2

Filed 03/02/2007

Page 7 of 7

Key to Illumina's Objections To Affymetrix's Proposed Trial Demonstratives Submitted March 2, 2007

The document contains matter that is not considered evidence, but rather it contains legal conclusions/statutory language/case language or attorney argument of supposition that is impermissible and prejudicial. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403. F The document lacks supporting foundation. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403. H The document constitutes or contains hearsay in that it is an out-of-court statement offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Fed. R. Evid. 802. Inc The use of this document without accompanying testimony, other parts of the document, or another document, and is misleading and prejudicial. Fed. R. Evid. 403. IS The document is an improper summary of other material. Fed. R. Evid. 1006 M The demonstrative was not produced to Illumina during the exchange of demonstrative exhibits. Illumina reserves the right to amend its objections when and if Affymetrix provides the demonstrative to Illumina. MIL3 The document contains matter that is the subject of Illumina's Motion In Limine No. 3 pending before the Court. Illumina reserves the right to amend its objections upon ruling by the Court. O Pursuant to Judge Farnan's December 21, 2005 Order, any products released after December 7, 2005 are not at issue in this case. P The document is prejudicial in that its probative value, if any, is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. Fed. R. Evid. 403. R The document is irrelevant; it does not tend to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of this action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Fed. R. Evid. 401. S The document contains information that is speculative.

E