Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv-06169-BZ

Document 25

Filed 02/01/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) [email protected] Amie D. Rooney (SBN 215324) [email protected] SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 Attorneys for Defendant ABN AMRO Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 E&M TRUST, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

v. ABN AMRO BANK, N.A., PB TRADING S.A., JAIME S. DREYFUS ZAMOKEVICH, J. RICHTER, RUDY BECKMAN, GRIP VERKIN,

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. C07-06169 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT ABN AMRO BANK, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Jude: The Hon. Bernard Zimmerman Date Action Filed: December 5, 2007 Trial Date: Not yet set

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. C07-06169

Case 3:07-cv-06169-BZ

Document 25

Filed 02/01/2008

Page 2 of 2

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiff E&M Trust ("Plaintiff") filed its complaint pro se in the above-

2 captioned case on December 5, 2007; 3 WHEREAS, on December 28, 2007, defendant ABN AMRO Bank, N.A. ("ABN

4 AMRO") filed a motion to enlarge time to respond to the complaint because ABN AMRO's counsel had 5 been unsuccessful in contacting Plaintiff to secure its agreement to an extension; 6 WHEREAS, on January 2, 2008, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause requiring

7 Plaintiff to explain why the case should not be dismissed for non-compliance with the Civil Local Rule 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

requiring a corporation to appear only through legal counsel, or, in the alternative, requiring Plaintiff to retain counsel, and staying the case pending resolution of the issue; WHEREAS, on January 25, 2008, Plaintiff filed a notice of appearance of counsel; WHEREAS, on January 28, 2008, the Court discharged the Order to show cause and lifted the stay; WHEREAS Plaintiff's counsel has agreed to extend the time in which ABN AMRO may answer, move, cross-complain or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint through March 31, 2008; and WHEREAS no prior extensions have been granted for the time in which ABN AMRO could answer, move, cross-complain or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. ABN AMRO's time to answer, move, cross-complain or otherwise respond to the

complaint is hereby extended through March 31, 2008. IT IS SO ORDERED. January 31st Date: __________________, 2008
S DISTRICT TE C TA

UNIT ED

The Honorable Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge Northern District of California

RT U O

S

ER

N

1 C F D I S T I C T O [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT R CASE NO. C07-06169

A

LI

FO

imm ernard Z Judge B

erman

R NIA

OO IT IS S

D RDERE

NO

RT

H