Free Motion to Dismiss - District Court of California - California


File Size: 41.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 2, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 364 Words, 2,329 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/198375/37.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss - District Court of California ( 41.2 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-06198-MHP

Document 37

Filed 05/02/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

COOKROOSWILBURTHOMPSON LLP TRACY THOMPSON, CBN 88173 MICHAEL E. WILBUR, CBN 152361 221 Main Street, Suite 1600 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: 415-362-7071 Facsimile: 415-362-7073 Attorneys for Defendant PRAVEEN CHAKRAVARTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

THOMAS WEISEL PARTNERS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and THOMAS WEISEL INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED, an Indian company, Plaintiffs, vs. BNP PARIBAS, a French corporation, BNP PARIBAS SECURITIES (ASIA) LIMITED, a Hong Kong company, and PRAVEEN CHAKRAVARTY, an individual, Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No.: C 07-06198 MHP DEFENDANT PRAVEEN CHAKRAVARTY'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS Hearing: July 28, 2008 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: 15 The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel

THOMAS WEISEL v. BNP PARIBAS, et al. CASE NO. C 07-06198 MHP

DEF. CHAKRAVARTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 3:07-cv-06198-MHP

Document 37

Filed 05/02/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on July 28, 2008, at 2:00 p.m., defendant Praveen Chakravarty will and hereby does move, in Courtroom 15 of the above-entitled Court located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, for an order dismissing all claims brought by plaintiff Thomas Weisel Partners LLC on the ground that Thomas Weisel Partners LLC lacks standing. In addition, defendant Praveen Chakravarty will and hereby does also move for an order dismissing the First Amended Complaint in its entirety on the following alternative grounds: 1. The First Amended Complaint should be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over defendant Praveen Chakravarty. 2. The First Amended Complaint should also be dismissed on the basis of forum non conveniens. Dated: May 2, 2008. COOKROOSWILBURTHOMPSON LLP

By

/S/ TRACY THOMPSON Attorneys for Defendant PRAVEEN CHAKRAVARTY

THOMAS WEISEL v. BNP PARIBAS, et al. CASE NO. C 07-06198 MHP

DEF. CHAKRAVARTY'S NOTICE OF MOTION 1