Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv—00910-GIVIS Document 184 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
I FIIh\lwrdAFF!IJriEO.':·`}·`IC.E.'i`
NE\\’\'OlU·l
LONDON
1.os.·.ncs1.t-is
CHECAGO
HOUSTON
M1ct~1i¤eat, rt. 1.AsTows1<1 ,,,_m_M,_,,,_,,,_,m
ntttect nina.; 302.651.4% SM, DIEGO
E·MZ-UL: mla.stowski@dumcmo¤is.com SAN FRMCESCO
l3OS`§`ON
'l|»"I|'H’.d[lG!I£Z!?IDTl‘l:S.COl?I “»ASH§NGTON. DC
LAS \’EG.·\S
:\TL.·\.NTA
Jllly 25, M[A]t.{]
mnsauneu
NEWARK
_ · _ ALLENTDWN
Via E—F1l1ng wittiineren
l!:\RR.[SBU'RG
nan. Gregory M. sian, u.s.o.i. l{L§',f$Y§_$Z‘g,
United States District Court
J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
844 N. King Street- Room 4324
Wilmington, DE 1980i
Re: Integrated Health v. THCI Co.: 04-910 {GMS)
Dear Judge Sleet:
We are the attorneys for plaintiffs and additional counterclaim defendant Abe Briarwood
Corporation (collectively, "Plaintiffs"). We have moments ago tiled a motion to amend the
Scheduling Order in this case (Docket No. 183), seeking inter alia to stay discovery proceedings
until the motion for a remand to State court, currently under advisement, has been decided.
Because that motion can and should also be construed as a motion for a protective order, we are
requesting a conference with the Court for the motion, treating it as one for a protective order.
Please treat our tiled motion as our statement ofthe issues here involved for the conference. A
copy of that motion, exhibits thereto omitted, accompanies this letter.
This matter was discussed between out—of~State co—counsel in an attempt to resolve this
without Court intervention, but that attempt was unsuccessful.
Respectfully yours,
Michael R. Lastowski
cc: (via e—mail) Collins J. Seitz, Esq. (w/o encl.)
David S. Sager, Esq. (w/o encl.)
Aurora Cassirer, Esq. (w/o encl.)
Daniel J. Deliranceschi, Esq. (w/o encl.)
DUANE Moruus tw
nun Noam Manner smear, sum; imo wnniucron, or wsoni;46 prions; zo2.issv.4s>uo mx; sa;.ssv..wui