Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 63.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 13, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 380 Words, 2,298 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8265/46.pdf

Download Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware ( 63.0 kB)


Preview Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv—00913-GMS Document 46 Filed 03/13/2006 Page1 of2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
THERESA CROTHER, GEORGE )
GREEN, GREGORY PARISE, MICHAEL )
WHETSTONE, )
Plaintiffs, g
v. g Civil Action No. 04-913-KAJ
TOWN OF DEWEY BEACH, SAMUEL g
MACKERT, PATROLMAN ZACHARY )
PETTYJOHN and PATROLMAN JOHN )
WHEATLEY, )
Defendants. g
SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
At Wilmington this 13'“ day of March, 2006,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s Scheduling Order dated November 8,
2004 (D.l. 15) and First Amended Scheduling Order dated September 28, 2005 (D.l.
40), are amended as follows:
1. Discovery
a. Discovegg Cut Off. All discovery in this case shall be initiated so
that it will be completed on or before April 30, 2006. The Court encourages the parties
to senxe and respond to contention interrogatories early in the case. Unless otherwise
ordered by the Court, the limitations on discovery set forth in Local Rule 26.1 shall be
strictly observed.
b. Disclosure of Expert Testimony. Unless otherwise agreed to by the
parties, they shall file their initial Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 28(a)(2) disclosures of
expert testimony on or before ninety days before the date of the completion of

Case 1:04-cv—00913-GMS Document 46 Filed 03/13/2006 Page 2 of 2
discovery; and they shall file a supplemental disclosure to contradict or rebut evidence
on the same subject matter identified by another party sixty days before the date for the
completion of discovery. To the extent any objection to expert testimony is made
pursuant to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S.
579 (1993), it shall be made by motion no later than the deadline for dispositive motions
set forth herein, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
2. Case Dispositive Motions. All case dispositive motions, an opening brief,
and affidavits, if any, in support of the motion shall be served and filed on or before
May 30, 2006. Briefing will be presented pursuant to the Court’s Local Rules.
All other deadlines as set forth in the Court’s November 8, 2004 Scheduling
Order (D.l. 15) and September 25, 2005 First Amended Scheduling Order shall remain
in effect.
rf S
Qi 2/ »e·/ea .
. U TED STA -4% TRI JUDGE
2