Free Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 53.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 387 Words, 2,602 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8295/34-1.pdf

Download Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Delaware ( 53.7 kB)


Preview Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-00943-KAJ Document 34 Filed O4/13/2005 Paget 0f2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
DINO G. PETROCELLI, )
Plaintiff, I
)
vs. )
) Case Not O4·CV~943»KA.l
CPRYSLER CORPORATION, MOPAR )
DIVISION, )
Defendant. l
JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(cs), the parties jointly
request that the Court enter the accompanying Proposed Agreed Protective Order and
state the following in support:
This action involves claims of discrimination based on national origin.
Defense of plaintiffs claims may require production of personnel, performance, and
other records pertaining to non—party employees and former employees of
DairnlerChrysler, DaimlerChrysler treats as confidential information provided to
DaimlerChrysler by its employees in their employment applications, and information
maintained in their confidential personnel files —— to the extent the information is not
generally applicable to all employees. Additionally, defense of plaintiff’s claim may
require production of confidential financial and other proprietary information of
DaimlerChrysler. Public disclosure of these categories of confidential information may
cause embarrassment and/or financial or competitive harm to an individual or entity who
is the subject ofsuch informationt
The parties have attempted to narrowly draft the Proposed Agreed
Protective Order based on discovery they believe may be requested in this case, The

Case 1:04-cv-00943-KAJ Document 34 Filed O4/13/2005 Page 2 of 2
parties, however, do not waive their right to object to those documents’ adrnissibility on
the basis of relevance, foundation, authentication or any other basis.
For ali ofthe aforementioned reasons, the parties respectfully request that
the Court approve and enter the accompanying Proposed Agreed Protective Order.
POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
By: ls! Dino G. Petrocelii By: /s/ Sarah E. DiLuzio
Dino G. Petroceili Jennifer Gimler Brady (Bar LD. #2874)
129 Emery Court Sarah E. DiLuzio (Bar LD. #4085)
Newark, DE 19711 Hercules Piaza, 6"' Floor
1313 North Market Street
Plaintyf P.O. Box 951
Wilmington, DE 19801
(302) 984·6000
(302) 658-1192
sdiluzio@_gotterande1·son.corn
OF COUNSEL:
Wiliiarn C. Martucci, Mo. #28237*
Kristen Aggeler Page, Mo. #50852*
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON, LLP
2555 Grand Blvd.
Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2613
Tei: 816-474-6550
Fax: 816~42l—5547
*Admitted Pro Hao Vice
Aitorrzeysfor D¤imle1·Ch:ysler· Corpomrion
Dated: Aprii 13, 2005
PA&C-677883vl
.. 2 -